Replies

Here we go.
Question by question.

1) The second law of thermodynamics says "no" to evolution
This is wrong and has been debunked so many times it is ridiculous to even contemplate it. Only those with no understanding of the 2LoT believe it.
2) Evolution can't explain the change from non-living matter to living things
This is abiogenesis, not evolution. If anything it is more related to chemistry than evolution.
3) The missing links are still missing
Check the lineage shown for Homonids, Cetaceans, Equines to see dozens of transitional fossils.
4) Complex, interdependent systems cannot have evolved slowly.
At best this claim is nothing but conjecture that has no science behind it.
5) Experiments involving mutation do not make living things evolve. An insect that at one time was a fly but after mutation had 4 wings shows that evolution is not possible?
6) Probability shows that evolution is not going to occur
I have debunked this in this thread. Others have debunked it more times than you can imagine.

You are debunked...defrocked, and deceived. Those far better than your arrogant self say:

"The fossil record is considered to be the primary evidence for evolution, yet it does not demonstrate a complete chain of life from simple forms to complex."

Larry Vardiman, Professor from the Department of Astro-Geophysics for Creation Research, USA.

Larry holds a PhD in Atmosperic Science from Colorado State University.

All you proven is your cause and its gurus, disciples as it were, are not b_sharp but b_sh**.

I see the 'gambit' for what it is, and 90% of it has ZERO to do with science evolution creation and argument there of. When and if I get the time I'll put the 'gambit' down step by step.