Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey

That would exclude creationism and ID from the discussion





Senseless dribble.


1,029 posted on 08/02/2005 6:56:07 PM PDT by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1026 | View Replies ]


To: eleni121

You decided that the set of theories would be included. That excludes creationism and ID.


1,035 posted on 08/02/2005 7:05:02 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1029 | View Replies ]

To: eleni121
That would exclude creationism and ID from the discussion "

"Senseless dribble."

Unless they can come up with some testable and falsifiable theories, their exclusion is very true. It does not have anything to do with close mindedness, just science. An example of this is theories such as Lamarckism, Mutationism, and Neutralism, all at one time considered radical. Lamarkism was rejected and Neutralism and Mutationism were both accepted and incorporated into the modern synthesis. That is not being close minded.

1,049 posted on 08/02/2005 7:26:41 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1029 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson