Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker

True.

People compare Bush's numbers to Clinton's - but Bush is facing many serious issues, and is NOT kicking the can down the road as Clinton did.


11 posted on 08/01/2005 10:14:47 AM PDT by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: cvq3842

The polls on Bush's job approval I think are misleading...we may not be 100% with him all the time, but some people who say they disapprove of Bush would still choose him as the chief executive over any Democrat currently being considered for 08.


14 posted on 08/01/2005 10:22:16 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: cvq3842

Bush's low numbers right now are due IMHO primarily to high gas prices and the MSM campaign against the war in Iraq. I think there is also a component to the numbers the media probably don't even know about, which is conservative unhappiness with Bush over his refusal to veto bloated spending measures and continued fighting of the WOT by Marquess of Queensberry rules.


15 posted on 08/01/2005 10:27:55 AM PDT by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: cvq3842
People compare Bush's numbers to Clinton's - but Bush is facing many serious issues, and is NOT kicking the can down the road as Clinton did.

LibDem playbook is to retain and foster the problem and never have a solution for any problem. Keep: Sosh-i-curity, affirmative action, always press minimum wage, bash away at 'job loss' even though we are statistically at full employment...the list goes on.

51 posted on 08/01/2005 5:26:49 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson