[Cincinatus' Wife]

I wonder how many msm outlets will give this an airing.

I hope Rush talks about it today.

[Tom_Busch]

Is he back today??? I don't care what anyone says, life is not the same without El Rushbo. I like Levin and Hewitt too, but I hardly ever get to hear them.

[pageonetoo]

I hope Rush talks about it today.

Why care? Are you unable to think for yourself? I don't listen to him these days. He says something, then says it agains, then again, then again... you get the picture.

I enjoyed the Rush Limbaugh Show of the early days in the '90's. He actually added something fresh. With his updates, and all the fun-poking he did, it was a hoot. He always preaches to the choir, but the chorus button has become stuck...Now he just hashes, and rehashes!

He still has a voice, but it doesn't say as much, these days, except to the choir! My voice keeps me out of it...

If you want to support a lying druggie, that's fine! I'll get my news from FR, and the net! I usually find out things the same way he does!

[gop_gene]

I wonder how many msm outlets will give this an airing.

I wouldn't put it past them, but I would be absolutely dumbstruck if the media didn't at least mention this. Novak is far from being an obscure player. But we shall see.

[Red Badger]

...msm outlets ...

MuSliM outlets........

They will ignore it with ALL their might!......

[HawaiianGecko]

 

 

	[I wonder how many msm outlets will give this an airing.] Well, in the MSM the following appears in the second sentence of the first paragraph; In his syndicated column, Novak did not dispute that former CIA spokesman Bill Harlow told him he should not print the covert officer's name, Valerie Plame, during conversations they had prior to Novak's July 14, 2003 column. accurate, but misleading.  You have go to the 11th paragraph and get past all the crud about who Valerie Plame is, why Rove should be persecuted, the valor of her husband etc., before you get to any mention of Novak saying Harlow's account is "so patently incorrect and so abuses my integrity as a journalist.'' (the guy is lying through his teeth)  By then most readers will have given up on the story, and unless they read Novaks column in the Chicago-Sun-Times or the coverage by "Editor & Publisher", they will not have a clue of what Bob Novak was really writing about.

!

 

[I wonder how many msm outlets will give this an airing.]

Well, in the MSM the following appears in the second sentence of the first paragraph;

In his syndicated column, Novak did not dispute that former CIA spokesman Bill Harlow told him he should not print the covert officer's name, Valerie Plame, during conversations they had prior to Novak's July 14, 2003 column.

accurate, but misleading.  You have go to the 11th paragraph and get past all the crud about who Valerie Plame is, why Rove should be persecuted, the valor of her husband etc., before you get to any mention of Novak saying Harlow's account is "so patently incorrect and so abuses my integrity as a journalist.'' (the guy is lying through his teeth)  By then most readers will have given up on the story, and unless they read Novaks column in the Chicago-Sun-Times or the coverage by "Editor & Publisher", they will not have a clue of what Bob Novak was really writing about.

 

[My2Cents]

I wonder how many msm outlets will give this an airing.

I can count them on less than one finger.