What utter nonsense. That's the same contorted logic that finds gun manufacturers responsible for gun crime. Besides, I'd hardy call half a dozen murders in twenty some years "blood in the streets."
Did you employ this level of hyperbole when they were prosecuting a defacto charitable organization under RICO statutes?
I'm talking about average citizens who are turned off by such methodology, myself included
Which methodology is that? What methodology would you prefer?
Keep it up and it is very easy to lose massive support. - Again.
Empty warnings. The tide is moving in the right direction for quite some time now, in spite of Operation Rescue, if not because of it.
You may as well be critical of Gandhi's methods. Was he to blame for other Indians that sought independence with violence?
'Providers'?
'Providers' of what, pray tell?
Lollipops and ice cream?
Your use of the language tells me everything I need to know about you.
Those who have helped empower the deaths of tens of millions of innocent preborn Americans don't have much right to stand in judgment of murderers in general, to my way of thinking.
That said, that he fostered violence against abortionists, and that his "adherents" have murdered, is the worst sort of exaggeration and hype, a vicious lie, and an utter disgrace.
You should be ashamed.