Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dodd: Bolton Lacks Support for U.N. Post
AP ^ | 7/31/5 | DOUGLASS K. DANIEL

Posted on 07/31/2005 10:32:04 AM PDT by SmithL

WASHINGTON - Anticipating President Bush soon will appoint John Bolton as U.N. ambassador, a leading Democrat said Sunday that Bolton would go without the confidence of Congress.

"He's damaged goods. This is a person who lacks credibility," said Sen. Christopher Dodd (news, bio, voting record), a senior Democrat on the

Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He said Bush should think again before using a recess appointment to place Bolton at the United Nations while the Senate is on its traditional August break.

"That's not what you want to send up, a person who doesn't have the confidence of the Congress and so many people who've urged that he not be sent up to do that job," said Dodd, D-Conn., on "Fox News Sunday."

As Bush left church on Sunday, a reporter shouted a question, asking whether the president would be appointing Bolton. Bush smiled and refrained from answering.

Two administration officials said on Friday that the president would appoint Bolton before leaving on Tuesday to spend August at his Texas ranch. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because Bush had yet to made the announcement.

Under the Constitution, the president may issue an appointment and bypass Senate confirmation when it is in recess. Such an appointment ends when the next session of Congress begins — January 2007, in this case.

Senate Democrats have led the effort to hold up a confirmation vote for Bolton, citing what they have described as undiplomatic behavior by the former State Department official.

"If the president recess appoints John Bolton, I can understand why because he's been waiting a long time to get the person that he believes is the best to represent his administration at the U.N," said Sen. Mitch McConnell (news, bio, voting record), R-Ky.

McConnell said he doubted that a recess appointment would have a strongly negative impact on the atmosphere in the Senate. If Bush withdrew the nomination, no ambassador would be in place when the U.N. begins taking up important issues in the fall, he said.

"Bolton's been sort of twisting in the wind since March," McConnell said. "Bolton's exactly what the U.N. needs at this point. The president's right on the mark in picking him."

The administration has promoted Bolton for a hard-nosed style that officials believe will help push reform in the United Nations.

Opponents say his criticism of the world organization and reports that he has abused underlings and sought to punish those who disagreed with him render him unfit for the position.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; bolton; dodd; dodderingfool; obstructionistdems; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Dodd's problem is that Bolton won't support cozying up to Castro.
1 posted on 07/31/2005 10:32:04 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"That's not what you want to send up, a person who doesn't have the confidence of the Congress..."

Frankly, Congress is so inept that I think their "confidence" or lack of it is irrelevant.

2 posted on 07/31/2005 10:34:45 AM PDT by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Good old "half a waitress sandwich" opens his lying mouth. Sit down and shut up you clown.


3 posted on 07/31/2005 10:35:32 AM PDT by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Bolton has the confidence of 50 senators, a majority

Just not Biden, Dodd, Voinovech, the three filibusterees


4 posted on 07/31/2005 10:36:18 AM PDT by CarlEOlsoniii (McCarthy goes after Communists with a shotgun; I go after them with a rifle -Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ContraryMary
"That's not what you want to send up, a person who doesn't have the confidence of the Congress..."

OK, Dodd... if you think he doesn't have the confidence of Congress, then put him up for an up or down vote - and we'll see if he does or not.

5 posted on 07/31/2005 10:36:22 AM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Dodd would gain a lot of confidence in Bolton, if Bolton would blow kisses to Hugo Chavez, Lula in Brazil, and Castro.


6 posted on 07/31/2005 10:36:23 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
If Dodd is against him then I am for him.

Dodd is upset because we will end up trying to starve Raul off after he takes over from Fidel.

This is going to play out for another few decades, as Chavez is sending the regime enough aid to keep the leadership on life support till the 2030's.
7 posted on 07/31/2005 10:37:27 AM PDT by mmercier (in what way princes must keep faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
In the case of the UN I guess I'm more inclined to break something in order to fix it. I'd keep trying for a Senate vote, if the filibuster is invoked - I'd pull the US Mission to the UN and impound all funds destined for the UN in escrow until the senate allows a vote.

Dodd is full of $hit when he suggests that the Ambassador would be less effective if he didn't have the support of the Senate behind him. I'm sure there have been more ineffective Ambassadors with 99-1 confirmations than ineffective Ambassadors who had 51-49 confirmations.
8 posted on 07/31/2005 10:37:28 AM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right, but never in doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I don't understand why Bush doesn't just abolish the post then and let the U.N. go its own way if Bolton is not confirmed. Just once I'd like the President to be blunt and play hardball with clowns like Dodd, who isn't fit to be elected ice cream truck driver.


9 posted on 07/31/2005 10:37:40 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They just don't get it...at all.
Why can't these clowns get snatched up by "insurgents"...oh, my bad, they are insurgents.


10 posted on 07/31/2005 10:38:03 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If Bolton "lacks support", as Dodd says, then why don't the Democrats just let him have an up or down vote by the entire Senate?! Why isn't some journalist asking Dodd THAT question?


11 posted on 07/31/2005 10:38:30 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Amen triple E


12 posted on 07/31/2005 10:38:35 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Dodd: Bolton Lacks Support for U.N. Post

Petronski: Dodd Lacks Method to Block Bolton

13 posted on 07/31/2005 10:39:25 AM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Beat me to it.

The hyposcrisy here, if not outright lies, is unbelievable.


14 posted on 07/31/2005 10:39:51 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This is purely Dodd's opinion ("damaged goods"). Dodd and his fellow assassins have done everything they could to damage Bolton to give Bush a minor political defeat. They have succeeded only in proving that they can obstruct someone using the filibuster tactic. If Dodd TRULY believed that Bolton was "damaged" (by his attacks) he would allow a full senate vote (which Bolton would win).

I hope the American public has seen through this farce and recognize that the Senate Democrats only continue to pole vault over mouse turds.
15 posted on 07/31/2005 10:40:15 AM PDT by RedEyeJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

His name is "Dudd" which rymes with "Mud" and "Crud".


16 posted on 07/31/2005 10:40:58 AM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
If anyone knows what it's like to have lost credibility, it's Dodd.
17 posted on 07/31/2005 10:41:41 AM PDT by LiberationIT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"He's damaged goods. This is a person who lacks credibility,"

Way to damage the inevitable UN representative of YOUR OWN COUNTRY, d***head.

The unashamed desire of these democrats to hurt the US shouldn't surprise me, but it still does, somehow. They truly only care about their stupid, dying cow of a party more than the country, and I defy anyone to prove otherwise.

18 posted on 07/31/2005 10:41:47 AM PDT by Dr.Hilarious ("My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity."-Joe W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Senator "Bucketmouth" Dodd is second only to Fat Teddy himself as being the premiere New England blowhard in the Senate. It's too bad that Joe Lieberman is too nice a guy to just walk over to Dodd's office and tell that idiot to STFU.


19 posted on 07/31/2005 10:41:52 AM PDT by Mad Mammoth (Some folks just need killin' = Clint Eastwood as 'The Outlaw Josey Wales'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The Senate is filled with human disgraces!!

Sorry to say one is my Senator, Chris Dodd.

Seems like the Northeast is overrun with dimwit voters.

Except New Hampshire.

20 posted on 07/31/2005 10:41:52 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson