[Mia T]

nano-ping

[Mia T]

ping

[carlo3b]

Brilliant as usual, and right on target.. BTW, how could we ask for more to wake up the slumbering Conservative giant, Hillary Clinton, Jimmy Carter, and Jane Fonda were all in the news this week, doing what comes naturally.. hating America in our face.. :)

[AngelesCrestHighway]

Hit 'em...hit 'em good!

[leadpenny]

Bump

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

ping

[bmwcyle]

bttt

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.

The Enemy Within HILLLARY is now hard at work fixin' to shut Freerepublic.com down during the next Presidential Election.

By having the Mainstream News Media she controls now calling our Internet Forum a BLOG, she hopes to have new Campaign Finance Law and Court decisions shut all BLOGS down from exposing her misbehaviors, a la Swift Boat Vets/2004, when she runs.

Most especially Freerepublic.com

How's it feel being HILLARY's Target No. 1, Mia T..?

.

[Mia T]

pong

[Mia T]

ping

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

corrections, additions:

NANO-PRESIDENT
the danger of the unrelenting smallness of bill + hillary clinton

by Mia T, 7.31.05


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
MAD hillary series #4
WHY MISSUS CLINTON IS DANGEROUS
FOR THE CHILDREN
FOR AMERICA
FOR THE WORLD

Ian Hunter recently observed that our leaders are shrinking. "From a Churchill (or, for that matter, a Margaret Thatcher) to a [pre-9/11] Tony Blair; from Eisenhower to Clinton; from Diefenbaker to Joe Clark; from Trudeau to Chretien -- we seem destined to be governed by pygmies."

Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy
Mia T, November 1999

ur leaders are inexorably shrinking.  According to our current mathematical models, they are shrinking at a rate of 6.7 per linear dimension per election cycle per terrorist attack.  At this rate, most leaders will be nanoleaders by the 2020s.

The leader-shrinkage function is discontinuous for
1992 =< t <= 2000 and continuous for all other t.

The 1990s saw in America a sudden, discontinuous drop in leader size, a drop that retrospectively, post-9/11, has been theorized to be its greatest lower bound.
(Can anything be lower than a clinton?)

"Two for the price of one," the clinton pitch in '92 -- (Did the clintons understand at the time that one was not enough?) -- only made matters worse. Missus clinton in the West Wing actually added to this discontinuous decrease in leader size.

History will record, therefore, that the clintons--the twofer, (1992-2000), were America's first nano-president.

The clintons continue to imperil virtually every sector of society, indeed, continue to imperil America and the world, with their exponentially increasing facility in manipulating electoral/policy matter and energy at ever smaller scales. Their "school uniforms" of the '90s became "nanotech uniforms" today; both are proxies for "fight terrorism," which the clintons have neither the stomach nor the know-how to do.

The twofer construct, transposed to circumvent the 22nd Amendment, is now poised to retake power. A self-replicating, Constitution-specific pathogen, the clinton nano-presidency, post-9/11, is a danger that we cannot -- we must not -- abide.

 

[Mia T]

NANO-PRESIDENT, MEGA-DISASTER: history will not be kind to bill + hillary clinton
To paraphrase Einstein: The unleashed power of terrorism had changed everything but their thinking, and they thus drifted toward unparalleled catastrophes

[FReethesheeples]

Maria, You've done it again! Bravo!

[Salvation]

Another excelelent thread. BTTT!