Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio's costly gun ban
Waterbury Republican-American ^ | July 30, 2005 | Editorial

Posted on 07/30/2005 7:27:23 AM PDT by Graybeard58

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Graybeard58
"Councilmen said the ordinance will reduce gun violence"

Kinda like how it did in DC? Will they ever learn?
21 posted on 07/30/2005 9:05:59 AM PDT by SICSEMPERTYRANNUS ("Our responses to terrorist acts should make the world gasp." - When Devils Walk the Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

The Constitution means whatever five Sup Court justices say it means at any particular time. Jefferson warned against allowing the Sup Court such power, but it has come to pass, and the inferior branches are not going to do anything about it, so we might as well get used to it.

It seems that someday there must be a definitive case about the Second Amendment; i.e. does it protect an individual right, or a worthless collective one?

As the Court stands now, I would be wary of the result, as it would take getting both O'Connor and Kennedy to step back from the dark side. If Bush hasn't picked a Souter in Roberts, then it comes down to Kennedy.

But then again, I haven't heard of any such a case making its way through the lower courts, so who knows when it will happen.


22 posted on 07/30/2005 9:13:53 AM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Anyone hesar how they are going to collect all those semi's in the hands of the "less than lawful"? Like those that are criminal on other counts to begin with? <<<<>>>>>>>
23 posted on 07/30/2005 9:14:10 AM PDT by lrb111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wmileo

It's just in Columbus, Ohio, not in all of Ohio.

Here in south Ohio we enjoy our 2nd amendment rights and have recently been enjoying concealed carry.

You've got to understand that Columbus is the capital of the state, is a major college town, and is a lib enclave in Ohio. It's sort of like Wash, D.C. There's a huge convergence of mindless socialism in places like Columbus.


24 posted on 07/30/2005 9:51:36 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76

LOL

I am a bit of a city guy myself, but since I moved to Springfield, I kind of like the peace and quiet too :)

I loved living in Columbus. it was by far the best area I have lived in (I lived in Pataskala, Reynoldsburg and Canal Winchester).

The problem is when I came back my job was at Wright Patterson and driving an hour and a half one way every day was killing me


26 posted on 07/30/2005 10:24:30 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Proud member of Planet ManRam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
"Ohio really isn't that bad."

It's not? It was when I grew up there. This is the state that gave us Dennis Kucinich (sp?) DeWine, Voinovich, Marcy Kaptor, John Glenn Howard Metzenbalm and the list goes on and on.
27 posted on 07/30/2005 10:33:38 AM PDT by Bar-Face
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bar-Face

I can't help the politicians that are elected here beyond my one vote and anything else I can do.

However, living here is more than just politics to me. It is also the atmosphere (generally good in Columbus and Cincy), the employment ops (I haven't had any troubles and I work in IT), the people (there are some very nice and courteous people here, but like anywhere else there are aholes too)....

in Ohio these days, it is all about where you live.


28 posted on 07/30/2005 10:36:26 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Proud member of Planet ManRam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76

LOL

Lancaster is a nice area.

My wife's best friend went to high school down there.

I have. Like all places it has it's good points, and it's bad points.

Probably something most everyone in the city would agree with is that Michigan sucks :)

I CAN'T WAIT to be at the 'Shoe on the 10th.


30 posted on 07/30/2005 10:46:16 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Proud member of Planet ManRam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
heheheheh


32 posted on 07/30/2005 11:09:28 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Proud member of Planet ManRam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: bill1952
Banning semis is banning everything except revolvers?

Unless the ban only covered handguns, and I think if anything it only covered long arms, that would still leave bolt actions, slide (pump) actions, lever actions, and break actions. Even if it covered only handguns that would also leave break actions such as the Thompson-Contender series, which BTW, are usually chambered in *rifle* calibers. :)

34 posted on 07/30/2005 11:26:54 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

They can't take away what they don't know about....building rifles, etc. is theraputic...


35 posted on 07/30/2005 11:29:14 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Actually revolvers are semi-automatics if they are double
action.....
one pull of the trigger for each round fired.

Think about it!
Think where this could lead...


36 posted on 07/30/2005 11:31:41 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

hehe

I have seen that one on the back of cars and trucks but never on a website.


37 posted on 07/30/2005 11:45:46 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (Proud member of Planet ManRam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Two months after picking Columbus to host its 2007 annual meeting and convention, the National Rifle Association decided to move the event to a city that respects gun rights and the Constitution.

EXCELLENT!!

38 posted on 07/30/2005 11:49:13 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

(( ping ))

Check this out.


39 posted on 07/30/2005 11:53:59 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

It should be remembered that this ban was presented as being against "assault weapons." Anyone who thinks this was ever anything but a deliberate misrepresentation is impossibly naive. Antigunners are liars and cheats and absolutely shameless about it.


40 posted on 07/30/2005 11:58:09 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson