Hi, my name is Marvin the martian "Save me a good seat!"
Yes, we can see where this is headed and who it's going to benefit ~ first the establishment of variations ~ then the short arm inspections at the start of the work day.
Hell in a handbasket.
Raytheon had better not expect to send the freaks to my building. We'll sik the dogs on them, metophorically speaking, with governments blessing and encouragement.
Raytheon is involved in a lot of really secure work for the government, How many of these freaks do they have working for them and are they really secure. I think maybe the govt should start checking into this.
To which bathroom do you send a man in a dress?
good grief.
Rosie the Riveter has a new meaning now
Also, don't certain categories represent greater security risks?
I think that they should gut spending for Massachusetts defense contractor Raytheon. Why not save $2 or $3 billion by gutting fraud from Raytheon?
Do we need Senators Kennedy's and Kerry's votes for any reason? Why not cut out their pork, and the Massachusetts waste at Raytheon.
In the 1980's, Raytheon was a big player in the waste known as SUBACS and Databus -- they had big roles in flushing Federal dollars down the toilet.
There has been something in the Waltham water for years.
This is just a smokescreen by big corporations to appear to be expanding employee benefits while actually doing (and spending) nothing. From the article:
"The company [Raytheon], which employs 80,000 worldwide..."
"Simpson [a freak] said about 18 other Raytheon employees are openly transsexual or transgender."
Do the math and you'll find that Raytheon, in all their generosity, instituted an employee "benefit" that 0.023% of their employees can take advantage of. Way to go, Raytheon!
Hi, my name is Marvin the martianI have been wondering about something, ever since I saw the women complaining about the word, father, on the birth certificates. Some of those women were actually dressed in men's clothing, sans tie, wearing no make up and a hair cut that could almost be seen on a man. Now, if a man showed up for work in a dress, we would call him a transvestite, so what is the woman, dressed in men's clothing and what is the woman partner of such a person?
When this cancer of liberalism finishes its course and America is left worse off we will look back on these days and say, "What the heck were we thinking!"
Any company that has a "diversity officer" is obviously run by lawyers. And I would think that people who are confused by something as simple as "gender identity" would not be able to do complex work in a high-tech company.