Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Passes Gun Control Amidst Protection For Gun Makers (mandatory gun locks inc.)
Gun Owners of America ^ | July 29, 2005 | Gun Owners of America

Posted on 07/30/2005 4:07:46 AM PDT by ARCADIA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: ARCADIA
That is a market choice; why whould you want to make it part of the Federal code?

Because it makes the anti-Constitution mob happy?
21 posted on 07/30/2005 6:56:35 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

There is no difference between Democrat and republican pols.
The repubs can't openly support all the liberal positions, because they want to keep their jobs.


22 posted on 07/30/2005 7:21:58 AM PDT by philetus (What goes around comes around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Burf

well...this is just ONE reason why I hold that the Democrats maintain a majority in the Senate.


23 posted on 07/30/2005 7:24:18 AM PDT by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [D] comprises fewer than the minority [R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
It shouldn't be in there; there is no reason for it to be there. The language should be removed.

Agreed, and it's possible, even likely, the House will do just that.

Of course that will cause much wailing and gnashing of teeth by the Brad Bunch, Schumer, etc., but that can be kind of fun to watch. :)

24 posted on 07/30/2005 7:44:08 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Burf
Again the Senate Republicans snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Senator Frist is just not a strong leader. It's unfortunate; here we have the entirety of government except for the judiciary, and we cannot even keep our eye on the ball long enough to get simple bills like this through untainted.

25 posted on 07/30/2005 7:44:19 AM PDT by snowsislander (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
That is a market choice; why whould you want to make it part of the Federal code?

It's not even really that. The locks are required to be sold with the guns in enough states already that it's easier for them just to package them with the guns. The built in locks are another matter. I've never used the one on my Witness, except to test that it works, and then to be sure it was OFF.

26 posted on 07/30/2005 7:50:33 AM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

This "trigger lock" thing is a load of kee-rap. Whatever happened to teaching kids to be safe around firearms?

I grew up around guns, and this was in the era before gun safes. Guns were either in an unlocked rack on the wall or standing in a corner of a closet. We kids knew not to touch the guns, or we would bring the wrath of the nearest adult down on us in a heartbeat. We also had graphic demonstrations of what guns could do when we observed the game that the adults brought home from hunting trips.

When we got old enough we were taken on hunting trips, and eventually we were allowed to shoot under the supervision of an adult. Any unsafe act with a gun brought a stern warning from an adult not to do that again.

I've put on firearms demonstrations in the past, and if there were any children in the audience I always made a special effort to teach safe handling of firearms to them. Hopefully I kept somebody from doing something stupid later on.

Bottom line: If kids were trained with firearms from an early age we wouldn't need trigger locks.


27 posted on 07/30/2005 7:59:26 AM PDT by billnaz (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billnaz
Bottom line: If kids were trained with firearms from an early age we wouldn't need trigger locks.

Using any mechanical safety device on a gun only makes it less safe. People come to depend on them and them somebody gets hurt.
28 posted on 07/30/2005 8:03:55 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

Actually the GOP easily 'has' the Judiciary Branch as well. To start with, 7 of the 9 Supreme Court justices are GOP appointed. Something to ponder..


29 posted on 07/30/2005 8:46:53 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

How dare these yellow-bellied cretins tell the citizenry
what types of muskets they are allowed to own!

30 posted on 07/30/2005 9:14:10 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

What??? It's mandatory to include a trigger-lock with the sale of a new hand-gun. It isn't mandatory for the owner to have to use the gun-lock. I just bought a new .45 ACP a couple of months ago and they included a trigger-lock which I don't use of course.


31 posted on 07/30/2005 9:55:57 AM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA

The idea that your gun should have a trigger lock is a reflection of the strength of the left on American culture.

Can't you just imagine it: Someone is seconds away from blowing you away in your living room and you say to him, "Wait while I run upstairs to get the key to unlock my trigger."

It is the liberal/left/socialists who should be locked away.

There can be no totalitarian rule in a country with an armed population. Or, as someone said, "A government that does not trust its citizens to be armed is a government not to be trusted."

.


32 posted on 07/30/2005 10:07:38 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon
It isn't mandatory for the owner to have to use the gun-lock.

Oh yeah, and that will hold until someone stands up and claims: "gun owners are irresponsible - they are not making use of all the safety devices provided by the manufacturer - lets fine them $500 / gun if they are caught, or perhaps put them in jail for a year...." (not mandatory for now, but certainly mandatory tomorrow)
33 posted on 07/30/2005 3:31:36 PM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson