Replies

It would have been nice if Tom could have won. That wasn't and still isn't a reality based pipe dream.

That wasn't my question, which didn't even mention Tom McClintock. It was about the choice between Davis and Arnold. Sure it's hypothetical, but what it's really about is the NEXT election and whether you'll fall for the same crap. The question was meant to determine if you are capable of admitting that Arnold has been far worse than you believed he would be, even though you were warned and denied it, believing that what you were being told was merely rhetorical advocacy.

It wasn't. As soon as it looked like Arnold was going to win, I voted against the recall.

Answer the question or look like a coward.

Well, there actually was a choice between Davis and Schwarzenegger when you get down to it. If you wanted Davis, you voted against the recall.

One of us did fall for something, but it wasn't me. You bought the premise hook line and sinker, that Tom McClintock had a chance to win. While you still try to cast me as the person who didn't know a thing about reality, the reality is that you were dead wrong. No matter how you spin it bud, 14% is nowhere close to victory. You've been brooding about it every since. It's not very becoming to you.

You questions are slanderous. You imply that I thought Schwarzenegger wouldn't be so bad, when in reality I recognized his potential for downside and spoke of it often. What I also spoke about was a brown separatist who was a member of the same organization that Los Angeles' new mayor is. Both are very sympathetic to an organization that has pushed the Aztlan model for decades. I'm glad Bustamante isn't in there. I am capable of understanding how bad that would be. Some people aren't.

I rather look like a coward any day than an uninformed pompous ass.