[BigBobber]

Thanks for posting. This made my day!

[Stellar Dendrite]

YES!!!!!!!!!!!

[EagleUSA]

Great idea! If these SOCIALIST ACTIVISTS are so keen on a socialist America, let us start by confiscating his land and turning it into a monument to what this country IS REALLY ABOUT. A free republic and people who are free, whose property is PROTECTED by its Constitution, AND PROTECTED AGAINST AN OPPRESSIVE GOVERNMENT!!!!

[bill1952]

Nice spoken gesture, but the day the Libertarians actually do anything, other than joining the Greens to force a recount of the Ohio votes, will be the day that I will take them seriously.

[lilylangtree]

Sounds like a good idea.

[SE Mom]

bump for later read

[talleyman]

LOL!

[Honcho]

What about the other three? Of the 5 Justices apart of this ruling, there has to be at least one local government where these 5 live that is conservative and willing to prove a point.

[Gritty]

I'm certainly not a Libertarian, and I'm for taking Souter's land as well. It would serve the jerk right, and be a marvelous exhibit demonstrating the lost cause of freedom.

I think the author of this piece is scraping to find some Libertarian quotes so she can marginalize this entire effort, kookifying it by mainstreaming it with the Libertarians.

[trebb]

Next out of the lefties on SCOTUS: "It is a hate crime to try to inflict a SCOTUS law on those who pushed it through. Only the peon John Q. Public should be subjected to unconstitutional tyranny.

[hellinahandcart]

mark

[SunnySide]

"In the spirit of the ruling, we're recreating the same use of eminent domain," said John Babiarz, the Libertarian Party's state chairman."

First time I agree with what "these" Libertarians are doing. Finally, they are (figuratively) putting the roach clip down and making the effort to walk their talk.

[jim_trent]

Just how is converting a property that pays taxes into a park that doesn't pay taxes fit into the Supreme Court decision? It was supposed to be that you could take peoples property and give it to someone else if the other person would pay more taxes.

Leave it to the Libertarians to get it a$$ backwards.

[Artemis Webb]

There is NOTHING more fundamental to individual liberty than property rights. The ruling by SCOTUS was an abomination. I know this is all talk and in the end Breyer and Souter won't be touched. I know it just as I know that I wish I was wrong.

[Still Thinking]

Plainfield Town Administrator Steve Halleran said he didn't expect Plainfield voters to support the Breyer effort, but Logan Darrow Clements, of Los Angeles, said he's gotten support from thousands of people across the country for his Souter plan, and the town clerk in Weare said she had to return checks from people wishing to donate to a hotel construction fund.

Oh, so now the VOTERS have to approve a eminent domain project?