Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
You can't use a detox ward and a rehab facility as supporting evidence that alcoholism is a "disease," then turn around and immediately shrug off what Namath himself learned in his rehabilitation program (in what was likely one of the most respected and effective alcohol rehabilitation facilities in the United States, too).

If you would go to a detox ward and rehab center, you would understand that it is called a "disease". The Namath quote did not exclude that, did it? He simply spoke that which he came to conclude via rehab. It's part and parcel the desired result. A way to deal with the disease.

60 posted on 07/29/2005 8:01:20 AM PDT by Glenn (What I've dared, I've willed; and what I've willed, I'll do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Glenn
It's part and parcel the desired result. A way to deal with the disease.

There's also a very realistic possibility that calling alcoholism a "disease" is part and parcel of the desired result -- a way to deal with self-destructive human behavior.

62 posted on 07/29/2005 8:04:17 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson