[NavVet]

I'm not a huge fan of Michael Graham. He can be a little bit like O'Reilly, feeling he has to balance every criticisim of the left with one of the right (even if he has to stretch reality to find one). For example, in Charleston, if you thought raising and preserving the CSS Hunley in a museum was a good idea, Graham would describe you as a "Confederista."

That said, he has hit the nail on the head with his assessment of the religion of peace, and if he loses his job over this, I will be the first Freeper pass the hat.

[dhuffman@awod.com]

Right on! Pleased to meet'cha. The Cracker-Graham equivocated too often for me to appreciate him wrapping himself in the flag now at this late date. HE worked here in Chuckton for CCCP and was pleased to use that as his excuse when called on his equivocation. How many stations has he been employed by? For what purpose? He may be a friend of the Republicrats but not of conservatives.

Welcome Michael to your world. Thorny ain't it?

[Wurlitzer]

"He can be a little bit like O'Reilly, feeling he has to balance every criticisim of the left with one of the right (even if he has to stretch reality to find one). "

Never understood this type of criticism from the right. Our views should be able to stand up to opposing views. Show both sides and let the left look dumber every time they open their communist mouth.

[mudblood]

I kind of agree. Though I'm not of the opinion that Islam is a terrorist organization (like Al Qaida), I nevertheless think Islam is heinously guilty, tainted, etc., by its millions of terrorist-sympathizing Muslims. I think the world deserves to hear Graham's thoughts and talk about them - Islam isn't talking about them, they are silencing him. Islam is as guilty of these terror attacks as the German citizens were of allowing Hitler to rise to power - they are guilty through inaction.