Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force Releases Two Boeing Small Diameter Bombs in Flight Test
Boeing ^ | July 27, 2005

Posted on 07/28/2005 7:37:12 PM PDT by Righty_McRight

ST. LOUIS, July 27, 2005 – Two Boeing [NYSE:BA] Small Diameter Bombs (SDB) were dropped recently from the same aircraft, scoring direct hits on two separate targets.

The test on July 26 at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. was from an altitude of 15,000 feet. Released from a U.S. Air Force F-15E at Mach 0.95, each weapon performed a planned one hundred degree heading change, traveled approximately 18 miles across the range from the release point and attacked independent targets spaced 30 feet apart.

"These were our 25 th and 26 th successful weapon flights and two of the more significant tests we've accomplished to date," said SDB Program Manager, Dan Jaspering. "They go to the core of the weapon's capabilities, which is getting to more targets with fewer flights, with incredible accuracy."

The first SDB hit within four feet of its target, while the second hit within 10 inches of its target. The two weapons were released from the same carriage, but each bomb had its own set of target coordinates.

The all-weather SDB weapon system can hold four SDBs and is compatible with every U.S. fighter and bomber aircraft. It has a standoff range of 60 nautical miles. At 71 inches long, this 250-pound weapon quadruples the weapons load on each aircraft. The SDB will first be deployed on the Boeing F-15E Strike Eagle in 2006.

A unit of The Boeing Company, Boeing Integrated Defense Systems is one of the world's largest space and defense businesses. Headquartered in St. Louis, Boeing Integrated Defense Systems is a $30.5 billion business. It provides network-centric system solutions to its global military, government, and commercial customers. It is a leading provider of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance systems; the world's largest military aircraft manufacturer; the world's largest satellite manufacturer and a leading provider of space-based communications; the primary systems integrator for U.S. missile defense; NASA's largest contractor; and a global leader in sustainment solutions and launch services.

###

Contact: Chris Haddox Boeing Air Force Systems (314) 234-6447 (office) (314) 707-8891 (cell) chris.d.haddox@boeing.com

Bill Barksdale The Boeing Company 314-232-0860 (office) 314-707-3294 (cell) william.a.barksdale@boeing.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: boeing; eglin; ids; miltech; sdb; smalldiameterbomb; usaf

1 posted on 07/28/2005 7:37:12 PM PDT by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
60 mile standoff?

Couple that with F-22 speed someday, and the range will only increase. Aint no SAM coming out that far to get ya.
2 posted on 07/28/2005 7:40:44 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

It's not the missiles we now worry about. It's various directed energy weapons.


3 posted on 07/28/2005 7:43:06 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
Small Diameter Bombs (SDB)

I don't like the sound of that... Sounds like a "Low Flow" shower head...

4 posted on 07/28/2005 7:43:35 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Think of them as JDAM Lite - all of the BOOM, less weight to haul around.


5 posted on 07/28/2005 7:45:59 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Small Diameter Bombs (SDB)
I don't like the sound of that... Sounds like a "Low Flow" shower head...

_____________

ROFLMAO !!!


6 posted on 07/28/2005 7:49:33 PM PDT by austinmark (Torture? Koran abuse? ... I'd Rather Be A Koran In Gitmo THAN A Bible in Saudi Arabia !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

If you can get it to hit within 10 inches of its target, maybe 250 pounds is enough? For lighter social occasions, of course.


7 posted on 07/28/2005 8:00:56 PM PDT by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
Nope, think long and skinny verses short and squat. Less drag means the momentum saved for glide distance.


8 posted on 07/28/2005 8:03:28 PM PDT by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

New 250 pound class bombs are designed to provide high precision and effective stand-off range when launched from fighter bombers or unmanned platforms. This type of weapon offers increased weapon's loads on current bombers and strike fighters, as well as flexible loading options for Joint Unmanned Combat Systems (JUCAS). SDB is designed to destroy a variety of targets, penetrate over 1.20 meters of steel reinforced concrete while inflicting minimum collateral damage, from ranges of 70km (40nm). The US Air Force plans to use these weapons with its fleet of F-15E, F/A-22, F-35 and unmanned combat air vehicles (UCAV). Current plans call for procurement of 24,000 SDBs and associated Diamond Back kits over the period 2005 – 2015. SDB will also offer extended range capability, utilizing standoff, precision attack gliding kits such as the Diamond Back, offered by MBDA. Other SDB enhancements include seekerless configurations, such as the Lockheed Martin PNAV.

9 posted on 07/28/2005 8:08:34 PM PDT by WilliamWallace1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Look out below!

10 posted on 07/28/2005 8:14:15 PM PDT by Lockbar (March toward the sound of the guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lockbar
and it is launched by left hand. Far out dude!
11 posted on 07/28/2005 8:22:12 PM PDT by Leo Carpathian (FReeeePeee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999

24,000 SDBs means alot of wedding interuptions or early climaxes.

mc


12 posted on 07/28/2005 8:37:17 PM PDT by mcshot (Boldly going nowhere with a smile and appreciation for life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999

maybe they will put one on the redesigned global hawk.


13 posted on 07/28/2005 8:56:41 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999

I like the boom from a large JDAM good enough. :D


14 posted on 07/28/2005 8:58:33 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WilliamWallace1999
"while inflicting minimum collateral damage"

Uhm.. great against a hard target, practically worthless against troops and relatively soft targets (trucks, jeeps, tents, a group of terrorists, etc) you want collateral damage.

Also I saw the name Loral on some of the parts on the plan. If Loral is involved that means the Chinese now have this too.
15 posted on 07/28/2005 10:14:44 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
It's not the missiles we now worry about. It's various directed energy weapons.

An even better reason to toss stuff from over the horizon

16 posted on 07/29/2005 3:40:50 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JSteff
Your post shows me that you do not understand the definition of 'Collateral Damage'.

Collateral Damage is by definition undesirable: It is unintended damage to non-military assets or personnel.
We have varying warheads for different target types and different conditions. When going after a tent camp you may very well use a different warhead than you would while targeting a hardened bunker. However, the dead terrorists in the tent camp/convoy scenario are not 'collateral damage', they are neutralized targets.

The term is one of art in not only BDA, but also in investigations and legal proceedings. It has an intentionally negative connotation as something we strive to minimize or avoid wherever possible.
17 posted on 07/29/2005 3:52:35 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

Your point is very well taken. With weapons this size, they can't shoot (down) what they can't see.


18 posted on 07/29/2005 5:03:41 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

"Your post shows me that you do not understand the definition of 'Collateral Damage'"

Thanks Admiral. What do you think your post shows me?


19 posted on 07/29/2005 7:29:14 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson