Skip to comments.
Navy Officer Warns of Chinese Subs
Taipei Times ^
| July 26, 2005
| Charles Snyder
Posted on 07/28/2005 12:24:00 PM PDT by Paul Ross
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
And the Administration is also trying to kill off the DD(X), the F-22...and maybe even the F-35 (which is a flying pig farm)...all while whistling in the dark about China reforming itself.
1
posted on
07/28/2005 12:24:02 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
To: navyvet; Submariner; Jeff Head; Travis McGee; Alamo-Girl; tallhappy; GOP_1900AD
Twenty years? I don't think so. These guys always put the number way out so as not to encourage or embolden the bad guys, but the real number is always a lot more near-term. Try 8 or 10. Maybe less.
2
posted on
07/28/2005 12:26:53 PM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(George Patton: "I hate to have to fight for the same ground twice.")
To: Paul Ross
Taiwan needs to become a nuclear power.
To: Paul Ross
......Navy Officer Warns of Chinese Communist Subs .....being built in Colorado?
/sdarcasm
4
posted on
07/28/2005 12:27:58 PM PDT
by
maestro
To: Paul Ross
It's off the subject but Big Al was the best officer I ever worked for.
5
posted on
07/28/2005 12:29:54 PM PDT
by
WHBates
To: Paul Ross
Yes. I sometimes wonder who the eff is running things. There are many people who don't think China is a threat, despite their numerous and recent threats to nuke our cities. Hell, I had one moron here on FR tell me that China was "not really communist".
6
posted on
07/28/2005 12:30:03 PM PDT
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: Doohickey; judicial meanz; submarinerswife; PogySailor; chasio649; gobucks; Bottom_Gun; Dog Gone; ..
7
posted on
07/28/2005 12:30:16 PM PDT
by
SmithL
(There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
To: MeanWestTexan
I suspect they already are to some extent.
8
posted on
07/28/2005 12:30:22 PM PDT
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
To: MeanWestTexan
Taiwan needs to become a nuclear powerHow 'Bout Us?
9
posted on
07/28/2005 12:32:43 PM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
They need to get rolling on it then. Maybe a sea-floor test somewhere in the Pacific after a nice medium-range missle test.
Make it clear what will happen.
To: Paul Ross
And the Administration is also trying to kill off the DD(X), the F-22...and maybe even the F-35 (which is a flying pig farm)...all while whistling in the dark about China reforming itself. . . . while we send $1 billion to tsunami nations (terrorist nations), $15 billion to Africa so they can maintain female genital mutilation, while we cancel billions of dollars in aid owed to us, and while we send billions more for every gimmee-gimmee hand in the United Nations.
American politicans are at war with America. China need not wait to attack the United States. America will be destroyed by America.
My tagline says it all.
11
posted on
07/28/2005 12:35:11 PM PDT
by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: Paul Ross
You have to wonder what in the hell the Bush White House thinks it's doing. At a time when we're being attacked every time we turn around, the Administration acts like everything is just ducky, we have Iraq under control and Red China won't really be a problem for twenty years if at all. So we don't need all of these defense assets.
I'm beginning to think some very dark thoughts about our Washington crap weasels.
12
posted on
07/28/2005 12:37:55 PM PDT
by
Czar
(StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Czar
"You have to wonder what in the hell the Bush White House thinks it's doing."
Like Nero, playing the fiddle while Rome burns.
13
posted on
07/28/2005 12:39:24 PM PDT
by
markedman
(Lay me down to a watery grave)
To: Paul Ross
While they decommission the VP squadrons and send the P-3s to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base.
14
posted on
07/28/2005 12:40:38 PM PDT
by
grobdriver
(Let the embeds check the bodies!)
To: Doohickey
China's submarine force is larger than the US', and "in the year 2025, they'll have three times [as many as the US] at the rate we're doing business," Konetzni told the base closing commission hearing.
What Vern Clark is doing/has done in down-sizing the US Navy disgusts me more than I can voice here.
15
posted on
07/28/2005 12:41:29 PM PDT
by
TruthNtegrity
(The sound of jets, the sound of freedom.)
To: markedman
Time for another Reagan era buildup.
16
posted on
07/28/2005 12:41:40 PM PDT
by
rog4vmi
To: SmithL
I wonder about how long the PLAN subs would last in the deep.
17
posted on
07/28/2005 12:42:59 PM PDT
by
BIGLOOK
(I once opposed keelhauling but recently have come to my senses.)
To: Paul Ross
Although I'm liking the F-22, I am of the firm belief that the way to handle China (and the only way to convince them that airpower wil smack them down) is to follow the John Boyd method: Many cheap, agile jet fighters, and flood the airspace with them.
18
posted on
07/28/2005 12:43:27 PM PDT
by
Mr. Silverback
("These people ARE the 72 virgins."--CzarNicky describes DU.)
To: rog4vmi
"Time for another Reagan era buildup."
Absolutely!
19
posted on
07/28/2005 12:44:28 PM PDT
by
markedman
(Lay me down to a watery grave)
To: markedman
Where's Lehman when we need him?
20
posted on
07/28/2005 12:45:48 PM PDT
by
rog4vmi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson