Skip to comments.
Family sues SWAT team after raid on their home (Oops... wrong house)
The Daily Herald ^
| July 28, 2005
| Michael Rigert
Posted on 07/28/2005 8:42:34 AM PDT by skyman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-193 next last
To: MikeinIraq
Ah! Hi Mike!
What does that mean?
>>>"as an ancillary issue."<<<
21
posted on
07/28/2005 9:00:43 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
something like it was unrelated but became connected (I believe).
the guy is trying to Cover his behind, and I doubt that is going to work...
22
posted on
07/28/2005 9:02:05 AM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(Proud member of Planet ManRam)
To: frogjerk
"the Chidester family, including Lawrence, his wife Emily and their adult son Larry"
The son, Larry, was outside, the dad, Lawrence, was inside.
To: frogjerk
The SWAT team should consider themselves lucky that the homeowners were not armed. Since the warrant was for a different address, an argument can be made that the SWAT team were not acting on legal authority, and that the homeowners had a legitimate self-defense.
24
posted on
07/28/2005 9:02:17 AM PDT
by
JimHorn
To: Red Badger
That's in the super secret advanced training.
25
posted on
07/28/2005 9:02:19 AM PDT
by
flashbunny
(Always remember to bring a towel!)
To: frogjerk
LOL
yeah that happens ALL the time I am sure!!!!
26
posted on
07/28/2005 9:02:26 AM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(Proud member of Planet ManRam)
To: skyman
since he had not yet reviewed it. "We dispute the accuracy of their version of the events,"
How can one deny some thing that they have not seen? Oh...government, facts need not apply.
27
posted on
07/28/2005 9:02:45 AM PDT
by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: skyman
If you have a warrant for a house other than the one you raid, you don't really have a warrant, do you?
In which case, the officers involved were no different than ordinary criminal home invaders.
28
posted on
07/28/2005 9:02:49 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws spawned the runaway federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
To: frogjerk
One might have been a Jr. The article said he had an adult son that resided at the residence.
29
posted on
07/28/2005 9:03:35 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: flashbunny
"There are too many instances of this happening across the country."
Yes, and in many small rural towns and cities, what use to be the friendly town policeman has become the new jackbooted thug.
It has definitely happened in my previous home area of west Tennessee.
30
posted on
07/28/2005 9:04:22 AM PDT
by
AlexW
(Reporting from Bratislava)
To: MikeinIraq
You are kidding me?!
Then I think robowombat is right, that is stalinist!
31
posted on
07/28/2005 9:04:59 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Calpernia
I honestly think it was a mistake that was carried WAYYY too far.
This does seem more incompetent than intentional, but more power to the family....I hope that SWAT team doesn't have a budget for the next 20 years or so....
32
posted on
07/28/2005 9:06:43 AM PDT
by
MikefromOhio
(Proud member of Planet ManRam)
To: JimHorn
The SWAT team should consider themselves lucky that the homeowners were not armed. Nah, since the Supreme Court upheld local gun bans as being legal, these are the folks they have to thank. A lot less barriers to totalitarianism these days. Why worry?
Does anyone have a copy of the consitution? I'm out of toilet paper.
33
posted on
07/28/2005 9:06:47 AM PDT
by
Stu Cohen
(Press '1' for English)
To: Stu Cohen
Ah, land of the free. This is what the boys overseas are fighting for. Out precious liberty Don't be such a putz. Cops are making raids all over the country every day, and you know what, THEY MAKE A MISTAKE ONCE IN A WHILE!. Geez.
34
posted on
07/28/2005 9:07:15 AM PDT
by
cowboyway
(My heroes have always been cowboys.)
To: skyman
Our militarized "law enforcement" agencies are the standing army our founders feared.
35
posted on
07/28/2005 9:07:28 AM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: Cyber Liberty; frogjerk; MindyW; Felicity Fahrquar
The next day, the Chidester family, including Lawrence, his wife Emily and their adult son Larry, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against Utah County and six SWAT team members. Okay, this has WEIRDNESS all over it..
THE NEXT DAY???
I could ONLY HOPE to aspire to having a client(s) walk (run?) into my office and I'm able to FILE a suit against MULTIPLE PARTIES by 4:00 o'clock the following day..
I am also sure that LAWRENCE didn't just peek over the dandalions to watch, but probably SAID something as well.
ADULT SON LARRY? Not sure exactly but why was he getting dressed? (as opposed to sleeping or going outside with Dad? I think he probably UTTERED some words as well..
36
posted on
07/28/2005 9:08:06 AM PDT
by
Experiment 6-2-6
(When the disbeliever sees this, he will say, 'How nice if I was also turned into sand.')
To: MikeinIraq
37
posted on
07/28/2005 9:08:10 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Experiment 6-2-6
I'd file the next day if it were me. 9:00 AM, while I'm still pissed.
38
posted on
07/28/2005 9:09:38 AM PDT
by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: AlexW
Yes, and in many small rural towns and cities, what use to be the friendly town policeman has become the new jackbooted thug It ain't 1955 and this ain't Mayberry, Goober.
39
posted on
07/28/2005 9:10:10 AM PDT
by
cowboyway
(My heroes have always been cowboys.)
To: flashbunny
SWAT teams used to be few and far between. Now every little podunk town can't live without one. And since they blow so much money on training and special equipment, they get criticized for not using it. Therefore, the SWAT team gets called out to apprehend people who have too many speeding tickets, a kid with an 1/8th of grass, and other "dangerous" people. They're out of control and they don't get in trouble for screwing up a clearly marked address and beating people up.
40
posted on
07/28/2005 9:11:10 AM PDT
by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
("A litany of complaints is not a plan." -- G.W. Bush, regarding Sen. Kerry's lack of vision)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-193 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson