Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dat Mon
Now...using the ACTUAL LANGUAGE OF THE CAFTA AGREEMENT... show logically and systematically and consistently why all this opposition and fear of CAFTA is unfounded.

How do you prove a negative?

Why don't you get the language in CAFTA that makes illegals suddenly legal. You can get it from hedgetrimmer. Then you can post it and we can discuss further.

70 posted on 07/27/2005 4:13:33 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with Marx, the AFL-CIO and E.P.I. please stop calling yourself a conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Toddsterpatriot
Seems we've been down this road before.. ;0) Its not proving a negative...its legal language...the intent can be inferred from the language, just as in any contract. It was after all NEGOTIATED by American representatives...they would naturally put the required language in to protect American interests...else they are lousy negotiators.

Im asking you all to show why you think this trade agreement is a good thing...it must be in the language.

Okay...Ill count you out of the discussion...I thought you were familiar with the CAFTA language.

Next....
72 posted on 07/27/2005 4:29:45 PM PDT by Dat Mon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson