Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/26/2005 10:10:41 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: blogblogginaway

If we are lucky they will completely implode in July of 2006. The RAT civil war is going to get real ugly. The militants they have developed over the years will become their worst nightmare.


2 posted on 07/26/2005 10:14:18 PM PDT by John Lenin (Hillary Clinton: Voted 6th most evil person of the last millennium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Unity? Unity?! They're supposed to be the party of diversity, not unity.


3 posted on 07/26/2005 10:14:48 PM PDT by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

A divider, not a uniter ... hehe ...


4 posted on 07/26/2005 10:16:58 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Be a Good Mullah Now ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
You [bleeped] up, boys and girls. You trusted her.
5 posted on 07/26/2005 10:17:00 PM PDT by RichInOC (Hillary! 2008: Vote For Her...Get Him? (Now THERE'S a winning campaign slogan, huh?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

All I got from their Centrist Message and future of the Party is "Bush Sucks"


6 posted on 07/26/2005 10:18:07 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

this is all smoke and mirrors to establish her as the "centrist" democrat...

nonsense


7 posted on 07/26/2005 10:18:38 PM PDT by Will_Zurmacht
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Idiots. They should be rallying around her, knowing that she's no centrist and, once in power, will reveal her true colors.


8 posted on 07/26/2005 10:18:46 PM PDT by Kryptonite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

9 posted on 07/26/2005 10:19:00 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (fiat voluntas Tua)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

It'll be alright the next time she treats us to one of those Godawful monotone screeches


11 posted on 07/26/2005 10:20:07 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
one of the most influential blogs on the left, Daily Kos out of Berkeley, Calif.

That's like saying MoveOn.org has been influential in elections for the RATS. rolfol! Only the left wing KOOKS like Barbara Boxer, John Conyers, etc. would be caught on Daily Kos.

12 posted on 07/26/2005 10:20:22 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Wow .. can't ya just feel the love in the Dem Party?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


13 posted on 07/26/2005 10:24:55 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway
Last paragraph of the article:
Meanwhile, Jesse L. Jackson reopened his decades-old battle with the DLC by accusing the group of fronting for corporate interests while ignoring labor and civil rights leaders. "The DLC embraces CAFTA and sells admission to its conference to corporate lobbyists," he said in a speech to the AFL-CIO convention in Chicago.
You go Je$$e! LOL
14 posted on 07/26/2005 10:25:56 PM PDT by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

This is a political calculation on her part. She believes it will cement her as moderate, and a little backlash from the Hard left will not be irreversible in '08 because they'll do what they did in '04. Suck it up and vote against Reps for power.

That stated the Libs ARE in midst of a civil war. That is real. It is not at ALL clear they will vote for someone pretending to be a "moderate". The Democrats do NOT like Senator Clinton. The despise almost as much as do those on the right. Their outrage is not a front to advance her with middle America.

It's going to be interesting to watch the Dems try to juggle each side. The Hard Left owns the party, but because of it, they are on verge of political extinction. The Republicans have their own battles with the "mavericks", but we can still get elected even in the midst of that power struggle. The Dems' opportunities shrink each day.


15 posted on 07/26/2005 10:27:11 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

This is all for show. When they have the opportunity to vote for her, they will all come home.


18 posted on 07/26/2005 10:28:41 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

It certainly screams of a typical Clinton machination. They'll come around, bet on it. Either they'll shut up because the whole thing was phony from the start or they will be reminded Who is In Charge when the time comes for her to reach for the nomination. Either way they won't rock the boat.


20 posted on 07/26/2005 10:33:49 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

Dissing the far left moonbats is a pretty shrewd political move. Kinda scary really. Hill WILL be running in '08.


21 posted on 07/26/2005 10:35:38 PM PDT by Space Wrangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

What's Hillary going to do? Thumb her nose at the group that catapulted her husband to the White House?? Of COURSE she's going to suck up to the "moderates". That's the strategy that's worked before and will work again. She knows that. She's not stupid.

She's got to keep her message from sounding like Howard Dean - saying one day how the party needs to appeal to Christians then the next day bashing them as evil and hateful, then the next day saying how the party needs pro-lifers then the next day saying one shouldn't be on the Supreme Court...

Hillary is tacking in both directions too much as it is. If she wants her candidacy to be taken seriously, she needs to know that you can't be two-faced in the Lexis/Nexis era.


25 posted on 07/26/2005 11:25:21 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Visit Club Gitmo - The World's Only Air-Conditioned Gulag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

29 posted on 07/27/2005 12:14:29 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

30 posted on 07/27/2005 12:15:39 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blogblogginaway

What do you mean angers left?

The left is perpetually angry no matter what; if it's not George Bush, it's Hillary Clinton, and anybody else who doesn't fan their fury and hatred. But is that a true political movement -- or just the self-association of the dysfunctional in this country now, the most visible of course, being columnists in the mainstream media.

Are we supposed to find them entertaining and informative? More and more they seem to be living remnants of life in the 20th century -- while most well-functioning people have transitioned into the 21st century. The main cause of their anger seems to be that the world is not returning to the 1960s so they can show us their collection of bell bottom pants and love beads they've saved for such a revival -- and saying, "I told you so."

There is no movement of the Left -- merely the delusions of the people time left behind.


35 posted on 07/27/2005 1:39:25 AM PDT by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson