OK, let's see:
You do a hit-and-run post an article unfairly critical of the leader of the largest Christian denomination on Earth, having "Anti-Semitism" as one of its headers, which can be interpreted as YA saying "The Pope is an Anti-Semite".
The Netanya events were unfortunately out of the time-frame of events spoken about by the Pope, so I don't think by any stretch of the imagination that he was consciously omitting the events to satisfy a perceived Anti-Semite bias from the Pope's part.
We don't need any reassurances from you, thank you very much.
Next time, try to think about the consequences that posting such ideologically charged articles might bring before posting them, and then not commenting on them (post-and-run).
I don't post and run. I live in a very different time zone than most Freepers is all. It is very early morning here right now, on Wednesday, July 27. For most Americans it is the evening of the 26th.
I also stand by the article. You are the one choosing to ignore decades of anti-Israel bias by the church. The article accurately reports the concerns of the Israeli government and many Israelis, myself included. If you don't like my views, well... I though Americans believed in free speech.