Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nonsense from the Idiot Department(Tom Tancredo)
Miami Herald via Buffalo News ^

Posted on 07/25/2005 3:22:39 PM PDT by Alex Marko

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161 next last
To: kingu

youre foolish....none of those countries will support the US if it is nuked and responds by nuking Mecca.

those countries you mention are all democracies and their citizens are increasingly anti-american...the US would get 0 support..

as Europe become more and more muslim watch for native europeans to become more and more anti-american


81 posted on 07/25/2005 4:30:24 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

Simple: PANDEMIC. It just began.


82 posted on 07/25/2005 4:31:07 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

We have to remember the words of that great Irish American: Patty Henry!!


83 posted on 07/25/2005 4:32:17 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie ('Cuntas haereses tu sola interemisti in universo mundo!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko
A certain quote comes to mind......

"The bombing starts in 5 minutes!"

He did not hurt the Republican Party, too much.

LVM

84 posted on 07/25/2005 4:33:38 PM PDT by LasVegasMac ("God. Guts. Guns. I don't call 911." (bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
well which do you think is more likely in response to a nuking of american cities?

I've already stated it; they would nuke Mecca first, figure out where the material for the bomb came from, and new targets selected. If, say, it is North Korea demonstrating their new nuclear weapons, the United States would announce that North Korea has 1 hour after (however many other bombs went off x number of North Korean cities) to unconditionally surrender to us or face the complete destruction of their nation.

As for public explanation - it doesn't matter. If it was North Korea, it was the North Koreans working with the radical Islamics. If it was Pakistan, again, they were just working with radical Islamics.

I'm not sure why it is so hard to understand that this question has been brought up many times at White House press conferences and Pentagon pressers - if the United States is attacked with weapons of mass destruction the United States will retaliate in kind. It is inflexible, not dependent upon who does it or how, it is stated absolute policy and I don't care who is in the White House, it will be how things are.
85 posted on 07/25/2005 4:34:39 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

Those nations are socialist, and have marginal military usefulness.

Currently, the balance of forces tilts to the US no matter how you look at any scenario.


86 posted on 07/25/2005 4:35:47 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: kingu

nuking MEccas isnt going to happen stop dreaming.

also Tancredo as i have written elsewhere has done tremendous damage to his cause of illegal immigration.

It will be easier now to villify those who want immigration controls.

Tancredo should go.


87 posted on 07/25/2005 4:37:44 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
youre foolish....none of those countries will support the US if it is nuked and responds by nuking Mecca.

I'm foolish? No, I am not. I don't think you understand what you're talking about. This isn't a car bomb, this isn't guys or gals with belts of TNT, this is an action of war. Incontrovertible action of war. There won't be hand hand wiggling, the left will never be able to pull the masses out for protests - the entire action and reaction will take literally hours.
88 posted on 07/25/2005 4:37:46 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
Tancredo should go.

I suggest you move to Colorado, become a resident in his district and vote against him if you're of that mind. Otherwise I suppose you'll have to learn to live with it, just like I learned to live with Nancy Pelosi's wacko statements. The only difference is that Tom's comments match announced policy.
89 posted on 07/25/2005 4:39:36 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: datura
Pop Quiz kiddies...

Three nukes go of in American cities, followed by total silence from both dar-al-Islam and dar-al-Harb.
Fifty- seven muslim capitals disappear under massive nuclear explosions, followed by total silence from both dar-al-Islam and dar-al-Harb.

What's the difference?
Extra points given to any answer that is truly coherent.

Why is it assumed that mysterious nuclear explosions can only happen within the U.S.?

90 posted on 07/25/2005 4:41:16 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Warren_Piece
On second thought, make that just Tancredo - this author is just an idiot.

Well put.

Any sane person knows that you just can't send the nukes flying willy nilly.

You give 'em 60 minutes advance notice.....THEN....nuke 'em.

Sorry, it's a flaw I've had for a long time.

LVM

91 posted on 07/25/2005 4:42:54 PM PDT by LasVegasMac ("God. Guts. Guns. I don't call 911." (bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kingu

""The only difference is that Tom's comments match announced policy.""


so who has announced we would nuke Mecca besides crazy tancredo?


92 posted on 07/25/2005 4:43:06 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
so you think western civ has the will to go to war with 1.3 billion muslims? and not only that but to win?

Of course.

If I weren't convinced totally, I would have already bought my prayer rug.

After all, Michael Medved and Hugh Hewitt have both been relentlessly pounding into me the idea that resistance is futile; Not because we are wrong, but because there are "too many" of them.

93 posted on 07/25/2005 4:47:33 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
so who has announced we would nuke Mecca besides crazy tancredo?

My mother always tried to get it through to me that insanity is defined by trying to do something the same way over and over again and expecting a different result. I've answered the question - I'm not insane enough to assume you'll respond any differently.
94 posted on 07/25/2005 4:48:19 PM PDT by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

57 Muslim cities. Why so few?


95 posted on 07/25/2005 4:49:03 PM PDT by datura (Molon Labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67

Have you actually read Tancredo's comments? Did you read them in the original context in which they were propounded?



96 posted on 07/25/2005 4:49:29 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: kingu

so you wont answer who has stated that our policy is to nuke mecca.

this nuking mecca is a dellusional fantasy, brought on by people who are frightened and have no clue how to fight a WOT. very very simple minds are work


97 posted on 07/25/2005 4:50:35 PM PDT by atlanta67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: atlanta67
There will be no bombing of Mecca...IF the west goes to war against all 1.3 billion muslims, it is a war the west and the USA will surely lose

Will the Persians be glad or upset that Islam will have been smacked-down since it was forced upon them by Arabs? I read some very hostile anti-Muslim/Arab posts on an Iranian site, and I got the impression they'd be pleased if there were no Islam anywhere. I wonder if the billion-plus number of Muslims would suddenly decline substantially.

98 posted on 07/25/2005 4:52:04 PM PDT by Squeako (ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: datura
57 Muslim cities. Why so few?

By sheer coincidence, that's the number of muslim-by-law countries in the world today.

Your mileage may vary.

99 posted on 07/25/2005 4:53:55 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
All his intemperate and thoughtless words do, besides handing our sworn enemies a propaganda gift, is to lower Congr. Tancredo's stature in the eyes of normal, rational people while elevating the stature of the yahoos.
100 posted on 07/25/2005 4:54:12 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson