Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: wcdukenfield
2 posted on
07/25/2005 1:05:46 PM PDT by
listenhillary
(Don Rumsfeld /Karl Rove - Next US supreme court justices - Will Dem heads explode?)
To: wcdukenfield
3 posted on
07/25/2005 1:06:01 PM PDT by
frogjerk
To: wcdukenfield
I agree with some of what Savage says, but he is starting to sound like a nut of late. As for Howard Stern number one? I refuse to listen to him or purchase any services from the Satellite company that will employ him, Sirius.
4 posted on
07/25/2005 1:06:26 PM PDT by
nikos1121
To: wcdukenfield
They are both bottom feeders.
To: wcdukenfield
But Savage was just saying last week that he'd beat Rush and Hannity??? Remember? He said Drudge wouldn't cover it 'cause he's on that same network?
Now I have to wonder, is Savage just dumb, or a liar, or both?
Owl_Eagle
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
it was probably sarcasm)
7 posted on
07/25/2005 1:07:04 PM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: wcdukenfield
Why anyone, conservative or otherwise, would listen to Michael Savage's constant whining is beyond me. I love conservative radio but can't stand Savage's pathetic hopelessness.
To: wcdukenfield
And Levin beats O'Reilly...interesting...
10 posted on
07/25/2005 1:07:26 PM PDT by
frogjerk
To: wcdukenfield
Michael Savage is a Howard Dean mole. But he doesn't realise that Howard Dean is a Karl Rove mole. :)
11 posted on
07/25/2005 1:07:39 PM PDT by
kesg
To: wcdukenfield
16th place vs. 17th place is Big News.
12 posted on
07/25/2005 1:07:42 PM PDT by
T'wit
(If any liberals get to Heaven, they'll lecture God on what's wrong with it and reform it all to Hell)
To: wcdukenfield
I'm sure this only happened because Savage is a complete nutburger.
13 posted on
07/25/2005 1:08:02 PM PDT by
joebuck
To: wcdukenfield
"the top 20 talkers ***in New York***"
This is not a big shock. Talk to me when he's bigger on the whole national scene!
14 posted on
07/25/2005 1:08:07 PM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: wcdukenfield
Oh....Rush and Hannity are beating Savage also. Listening to Savage you would think he had them on the ropes--ratings wise.
15 posted on
07/25/2005 1:08:39 PM PDT by
Busywhiskers
("...moral principle, the sine qua non of an orderly society." --Judge Edith H. Jones)
To: wcdukenfield
Savage is committing mouth suicide. It's a slow death.
16 posted on
07/25/2005 1:08:48 PM PDT by
fish hawk
(hollow points were made to hold pig lard)
To: wcdukenfield
It's actually kind of pathetic that a liberal lickspittle like Franken averages less than a thousand more listeners than a raving rightwing lunatic in a bastion of liberalism like NYC.
That's sort of like the Yankees beating the Red Sox by a thousand listeners in the Bronx.
18 posted on
07/25/2005 1:09:27 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: holdonnow
19 posted on
07/25/2005 1:10:06 PM PDT by
cyborg
(That's Mrs.Petronski to you thank you very much.)
To: wcdukenfield
Actually, this applies to Savage and Franken.
.
20 posted on
07/25/2005 1:10:37 PM PDT by
itsamelman
(“Announcing your plans is a good way to hear God laugh.” -- Al Swearengen)
To: wcdukenfield
Well, just goes to show you: When folks want to hear grade-A Bush-bashing, they tune in to the read deal. Al Franken. To the bashers, anybody else is a Johnny-come-lately caricature of Franken.
21 posted on
07/25/2005 1:10:42 PM PDT by
Cyber Liberty
(© 2005, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
To: wcdukenfield
Mark Levin beats 'em both.
25 posted on
07/25/2005 1:11:28 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: wcdukenfield
Damn, that's gonna leave a mark! Savage is off the deep end to begin with, wonder what this news will do to him!
27 posted on
07/25/2005 1:11:59 PM PDT by
rockabyebaby
(What do you like best about your life?)
To: wcdukenfield
That's interesting.
Weiner had 1000 more listeners in the list posted on Drudge last week.
Either way, he's still neck and neck with Franken.
And doesn't Franken go up aginst Limbaugh?
Weiner directly competes with Levin (who beats him) and Laura Ingrahm (who doesn't).
Any way you look at it, Weiner's numbers are pathetic.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson