Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fawn

The tars alone will destroy your lungs ability to cleanse themselves. The nicotine is a vasodilator that can interfere with you body's circulatory system. Also, I met lots of people when my wife was going through chemo who were dying of lung cancer for which there is no cure. Not one of them had not smoked for years. In the 7 years she was treated for breast cancer we never met a non-smoker who had contracted lung cancer. It's possible but rare. Almost all lung cancer patients are smokers. If you need more evidence, smoke for 20-30 years and report back.


21 posted on 07/24/2005 3:31:53 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: muir_redwoods
If you need more evidence, smoke for 20-30 years and report back.

Reporting back now, Sergeant. I've smoked for 42 years and intend to die at the hands of a jealous significant other when I'm 1/2 second slow climbing over the back fence carrying my underwear.

24 posted on 07/24/2005 3:45:40 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods

I quit 20 years ago. All's fine so far.


25 posted on 07/24/2005 3:49:01 PM PDT by MrLee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods

Just now read your profile page. Sorry for the flippant comment(although I still mean it). I empathize with your loss and hope you have found or will find the strenth to carry on. No offense intended.


28 posted on 07/24/2005 4:00:21 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods

"Almost all lung cancer patients are smokers. If you need more evidence, smoke for 20-30 years and report back."

Its not that simple - recent evidence proves that genetic precursors are more predictive.

In my and my wife's family, the smokers far outlived the non smokers. But then again the smokers were moderate ones - far less than a pack a day.


31 posted on 07/24/2005 4:18:03 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods
who were dying of lung cancer for which there is no cure.

Whoa, my 72 year old aunt is a walking zombie??? She never told me that 7 years ago her lung cancer killed her......She doesn't seem evil so I guess I'll leave the stakes at home when next I visit Florida.

The lung cancer rate of survival is incredibly higher than you may think!

32 posted on 07/24/2005 6:07:15 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Too many idiots, too little time to deal with them all......I'll just shoot what I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: muir_redwoods; SheLion

"Almost all lung cancer patients are smokers."



Ah well,if it isn't one thing,it's another,it's always somethin'-----in other words the ones that don't die of lung cancer will die of something else,probably another type of cancer.------seems like a no brainer to me.


34 posted on 07/24/2005 7:17:15 PM PDT by Mears (Keep the government out of my face!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson