Posted on 07/24/2005 1:59:02 PM PDT by wagglebee
Why.....the MSM pimps and Madame Hillary is who.
Seems to me that Hill's opposition could very well be the best reason to support Roberts.
Look at what we got the last time she opposed a nominee! We got Justice Clarence Thomas!
Mark
Here is a link to Anita's bio
http://www.oprah.com/omagazine/200507/omag_200507_anita_e.jhtml
Note: no mention of a marriage. Was all this bitterness towards Thomas more about a Lesbian rejecting a suitor who did not know she was black and gay?
Thanks.
Ms. Hill seems to have joined the class of professional whiners!
I take it she wants more whites in the NBA too, we are very under-represented.
Poor ol Anita....... she believed the lies that she was the plantation super blackgirl. She was selected and then shoved through the masses to the top of the affirmative action heap. She believed she was real....look at where she was and where she went.
She got to DC and learned she was merely mediocre and the life she lived was a lie.
Maybe she thinks she's doing women a favor in expressing these views but just the opposite is the case. She's encouraging people to think that any time a woman is appointed to anything it's because of gender, rather than merit. I would want to be appointed on the basis of my merit and gender shouldn't have anything to do with it.
I was thinking the same thing. The woman is most likely a paid liar. I wonder who is paying her this time.
Even less, as far as I'm concerned. I do wish that Clarence Thomas would make a statement now. Something to the effect of: "I have no concerns about there being an all-white SCOTUS in the near future."
Anita who?
Maybe Arlen could think up a few more questions for her.
1. Because that opens the door to accusations of tokenism from the left
2. Because that sets a precedent of assigned seats for certain races/genders/etc, rather than seeking the most qualified jurists
3. Because you would not have made this argument to support a white male replacement for Rehnquist, etc, so clearly your question is clearly nothin' more than political posturing.
But thanks for asking.
Liar, Liar pants are soaked.
Whoops... Maybe you should try some pics of the Fox(y) babes.
Try Condi Rice.
She's Baaaaaaaaack!
Pissing off Anita Hill is a pretty good recommendation.
Anita Hill claimed that Clarence Thomas put a pubic hair on her coke can as way to harass her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.