1 posted on
07/24/2005 7:39:10 AM PDT by
rface
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: rface
Wordsmything at its finest PING.
Poor Richard Cohen. Born with a dimpled chad in his cheeks.
2 posted on
07/24/2005 7:47:32 AM PDT by
texas booster
(Bless the legal immigrants!)
To: Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
4 posted on
07/24/2005 7:53:11 AM PDT by
zip
(Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 48% of Americans (NRA))))
To: rface
"...unabletomoveon.org..."Hah! Gotta love it! Steyn hits another homerun!
5 posted on
07/24/2005 7:53:33 AM PDT by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: rface
6 posted on
07/24/2005 7:53:51 AM PDT by
andyandval
(Try flushing a book down the toilet....get back to me on how you did)
To: rface
He always engages the reader and sustains interest while making fine insights. Who writes better?????
To: rface
He puts it well - and the mornon Dems just keep proving it daily. A "party" without a purpose FOR AMERICA, without substance, clarity, vision, and an honest output of their real agenda -- which still remains socialism, power, and control and all for themselves.
They are easy to defeat, since they do most of the work themselves!!
9 posted on
07/24/2005 8:12:29 AM PDT by
EagleUSA
(S)
To: rface
In the words of leading Democratic thinker Nancy Pelosi, "It is a decision of the Supreme Court -- so this is almost as if God has spoken." I'm glad that Nancy Pelosi has summed up the Dem attitude toward the Supreme Court so suscinctly.
To: rface
"That's one reason why some of us like the old-fashioned method of having the big questions of the day decided by the votes of free-born citizens. When you leave them to be adjudicated by nine men and women on the basis of their opinions and you wind up on the losing side, it's bound to feel less satisfactory."
Anyone else notice how this describes Roe exactly - as Rush has pointed out so many times. In the UK, they got to vote on the abortion issue - we had it imposed by judicial fiat.
The dims are bitter about a ruling that kept them from power - an Act of God if there ever was one. We at least are bitter about a ruling that has killed 1.5 million - that's million - babies a year. Who has the moral high ground here?
11 posted on
07/24/2005 8:33:05 AM PDT by
Let's Roll
( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
To: rface
I happen to be writing this in a taxicab stuck in traffic in Central London, where bombs are going off, and it seems to me last November was a little about all that loud exploding stuff, too. If the Democrats hadn't been so hung up on chads and the court, they might have had something to say about that. They did, they were against "exploding stuff", ours that is. They were somewhat more ambivalent about the "exploding stuff" from the folks wanting a return to the "good old days" of the 8th century Mid East.
12 posted on
07/24/2005 8:33:11 AM PDT by
El Gato
To: rface
13 posted on
07/24/2005 8:34:23 AM PDT by
SmithL
(There are a lot of people that hate Bush more than they hate terrorists)
To: rface; grellis; demnomo
The Democrats never recovered from the 2000 electionI would argue that they never recovered from the 1986 election, when they married themselves "till death do us part" to the worst man ever to win the Presidency. Or even more certainly, to his impeachment saga, when they sold the last vestiges of their soul to keep his pasty white butt in that office.
Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG
14 posted on
07/24/2005 8:41:06 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: rface; Admin Moderator
I'd suggest adding "(Mark Steyn)" or "(Steyn Alert)" to the title. Folks who mightn't click on the title, would click on a Steyn article.
Dan
15 posted on
07/24/2005 8:44:13 AM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: rface
he is expected to substantially reflect the views of George W. Bush, the man who nominated him to the Supreme CourtThanks for the info. It's great to be encouraged something right is on the horizon.
16 posted on
07/24/2005 8:46:31 AM PDT by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: rface
My in-laws are obsessed with the 2000 election and hate Bush. I do not bother to talk politics with them but have told them that unless their party (and they) get over it, they will continue to lose elections.
17 posted on
07/24/2005 8:51:24 AM PDT by
KeyWest
To: rface
Why can't I express myself like this?
18 posted on
07/24/2005 8:52:18 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
To: rface
Hard to beat the MAN!
Steyn at his best Bump!
20 posted on
07/24/2005 8:56:50 AM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...
Steyn ping!
24 posted on
07/24/2005 9:11:40 AM PDT by
Pokey78
(‘FREE [INSERT YOUR FETID TOTALITARIAN BASKET-CASE HERE]’)
To: rface
Richard Cohen, big-time columnist in that bastion of mainstream media, the Washington Post. And his first thought, on learning the name of President Bush's Supreme Court nominee, is of hanging chads.It should be noted that, for the sake of information and his craft (or maybe just looking for something good to make fun of) Steyn subjects himself to Richard Cohen's columns. I haven't been able to stomach that idiot's writing for at least 10 years. Steyn must really care about his work to put himself through that!
25 posted on
07/24/2005 9:16:54 AM PDT by
irv
To: rface
BAM!!!
Another one deep into the 2nd level deck.
To: rface
Excellent
Steyn Rocks BTTT
28 posted on
07/24/2005 9:32:42 AM PDT by
hattend
(Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson