Interesting.
1 posted on
07/23/2005 6:18:41 PM PDT by
Thebaddog
To: Thebaddog
We are fying a decrepid antique; I hope those astronauts have purchased extra life insurance.
2 posted on
07/23/2005 6:23:37 PM PDT by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: Thebaddog
NASA is now looking at a slight electrical grounding problem within the fuel sensor system that could allow it to be affected by electromagnetic interferenceI don't know... this just reeks of one of those "little engineering annoyances we decided we could launch with" that we seem to hear about after accident investigation panels (a la O-rings and shedding insulation). Just somehow something disconcerting about those kinds of statements.
To: Thebaddog
With such low production rates on the components and no repair shops along their path, even the simple things are still rocket science. I'm in the business and am continuously amazed when it all works.
5 posted on
07/23/2005 6:29:50 PM PDT by
Rockitz
(After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
To: Thebaddog
Pops self on head. Of course! EMI in the high VHF bands was transmitted from the speaker wire running directly into the skin of the main tank and focused by the concave surface at the bottom of the tank. The power density was thus amplified 10^2+/-0.5 in the same region as the transducer, possibly generating a lethal static discharge that could cause a chain reaction that would destroy the entire shuttle on the launch pad, killing the crew and countless seagulls and pigeons.
You'd think they'd just go back to the Gemini program.
6 posted on
07/23/2005 6:32:31 PM PDT by
dr_who_2
To: Thebaddog
So, if their fuel gauge read empty halfway home, what were they going to do? Stop by the nearest "Shuttle Gas & Go" and fill up?
8 posted on
07/23/2005 6:34:36 PM PDT by
Hurricane Andrew
(History teaches that wars begin when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.)
To: KevinDavis
9 posted on
07/23/2005 6:36:36 PM PDT by
Normal4me
(Hey Mr Sushi man, you forgot to cook my fish!)
To: Thebaddog
![Image hosted by Photobucket.com](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v253/chode6/chode.gif)
so let me get this straight, a sensor worth only a few hundred$ is a "Crit-One" system with NO DOUBLE OR TRIPLE REDUNDANT BACK UP SYSTEM and is holding up billion's of dollars worth of launch???
is it just me or is this MORE than a little piss poor planing on nasa's part...
16 posted on
07/23/2005 7:06:56 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: Thebaddog
The problem was isolated to the top three layers of NASA management.
26 posted on
07/23/2005 9:18:37 PM PDT by
Nachoman
To: Thebaddog
I just watched the video " Space Station" narrated by Tom Cruise...AWSOME! It is a documentary on the building of the international space atation. Having done all that...What is the problem with our latest shuttle flights? Is this a reflection of our new work force? Not as educated and not as thorough?
31 posted on
07/24/2005 6:34:21 AM PDT by
jetson
(throne)
To: Thebaddog
I just watched the video " Space Station" narrated by Tom Cruise...AWSOME! It is a documentary on the building of the international space atation. Having done all that...What is the problem with our latest shuttle flights? Is this a reflection of our new work force? Not as educated and not as thorough?
32 posted on
07/24/2005 6:34:43 AM PDT by
jetson
(throne)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson