To: Thebaddog
We are fying a decrepid antique; I hope those astronauts have purchased extra life insurance.
2 posted on
07/23/2005 6:23:37 PM PDT by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: ARCADIA
You're right. We had two whole years to build a completely new launch vehicle! Reminder: 112 sucessful launches and 2 failures.
4 posted on
07/23/2005 6:29:40 PM PDT by
Normal4me
(Hey Mr Sushi man, you forgot to cook my fish!)
To: ARCADIA
Here I am floating in my tin can...
7 posted on
07/23/2005 6:33:13 PM PDT by
dr_who_2
To: ARCADIA
We are fying a decrepid antique; I hope those astronauts have purchased extra life insurance. Then again, very little isn't known about the shuttles. I've had cars with 200k plus miles on them that I'd drive anywhere.
The operation of complex systems and engineering reliability are known and strict disciplines that usually function well when applied correctly. Thus the only errors in judgment are when politicians, lawyers or bureaucrats become involved. Let the engineers here be engineers.
To: ARCADIA
Arcadia, given the syntax and spelling of that statement I think I'll pass on your logic.
The Shuttle is still state of the art aeronautical technology that works in the real world.
Nothing else at this time even comes close.
Space travel is dangerous, and will remain so for the foreseeable future, IE, the next thousand years..
Engineering is not star trek, liberal wishful thinking nonsense.
It is centuries of hard work where progress is only possible by lifetimes of dedicated hard work by geniuses who push the frontiers of human knowledge only by standing on the shoulders of the giants who walked before us.
12 posted on
07/23/2005 6:44:28 PM PDT by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: ARCADIA
We are fying a decrepid antique LOL!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson