Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sooth2222

There must be SOME reason that the New York Times' Judith Miller is still in the hoosegow.

The cincher for me is that I don't believe for one minute that any of the so-called 'journalists' were going to the wire for a source inside the administration.

14 posted on 07/23/2005 5:46:28 AM PDT by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: elli1
The cincher for me is that I don't believe for one minute that any of the so-called 'journalists' were going to the wire for a source inside the administration.

I would not take that as a given – Judith Miller will be working as a reporter long after this President has left office, and without the ability to quote "anonymous" sources” within administrations both Republican and Democratic it would be almost impossible for anyone within government to provide anything other than "the party line", and thus almost impossible possible for reporter to write knowledgably about politics and foreign affairs

This is well understood on both sides of the microphones - it’s why we have limited “immunity” for reporters in the US, and don’t have something the UK’s “Official Secrets Act.

20 posted on 07/23/2005 6:09:23 AM PDT by M. Dodge Thomas (More of the same, only with more zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson