Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHINA FLOATS, AMERICA SINKS
Baltimore Chronicle ^ | July 22, 2005. | Greg Palast

Posted on 07/22/2005 9:00:48 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer

In case you haven't the least idea what the heck it means for China to "float" its currency, let me put it in the language we economists use: China's float don't mean squat. Yet our President, a guy whose marks in Economics 101 are too embarrassing to publish here, ran out to hail the fact that buying Chinese money will now cost more dollars.

The White House line to the media, swallowed whole, is that by making Chinese money (yuan) more expensive to buy with dollars, Americans will buy fewer computers and toys from China--and US employment will rise.

This will happen when we find Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction.

Economics Lesson #1: You can't change the value of goods by changing the value of the currency on the price tag. As my comrade Art Laffer wrote me, "If cheap currency makes your products more competitive, all automobiles would be made in Russia." Driven a Lada lately?

Economics Lesson #2: Don't take economics lessons from George Bush. Or Milton Friedman. Or Thomas Friedman. What that means, class, is don't believe the big, hot pile of hype that China's zooming economy is the result of that Red nation's adopting free market economic policies.

If China is now a capitalist free-market state, then I'm Mariah Carey. China's economy has soared because it stubbornly refused the Free--and Friedman-Market mumbo-jumbo that government should stop controlling, owning and regulating the industry.

China's announcement that it would raise the cost of the yuan covered over a more important notice: China would bar foreign control of its steel sector. China's leaders have built a powerhouse steel industry larger than ours by directing the funding, output, location and ownership of all factories. And rather than "freeing" the industry through opening their borders to foreign competition, the Chinese, for steel and every other product, have shut their borders tight to foreigners except as it suits China’s own industries.

China won't join NAFTA or CAFTA or any of those free-trade clubs. In China, Chinese industry comes first. And it's still, Mssrs. Friedman, the Peoples’ republic. Those Wal-Mart fashion designs called, chillingly, "New Order," are made in factories owned by the PLA, the Chinese Peoples' Liberation Army.

China's government, by rejecting free-market fundamentalism, can easily conquer American markets, where protection is now deemed passé. And that is why the yuan has kicked the dollar's butt.

In an interview just before he won the Nobel Prize in economics, Joe Stiglitz explained to me that China's huge financial surge--a stunning 9.5% jump in GDP this year--began with the government's funding and nurturing rural cooperatives, fledgling agricultural and industry protected behind high, high trade barriers.

It is true that China's growth got a boost from ending the bloodsoaked self-flagellating madness of Mao's Cultural Revolution. And China, when it chooses, makes use of markets and market pricing to distribute resources. The truth is, Chinese markets are as free as my kids: they can do whatever they want unless I say they can't.

Yes, China is adopting elements of "capitalism." And that's the ugly part: real estate speculation in Shanghai making millionaires of Communist party boss relatives and bank shenanigans worthy of a Neil Bush.

It is not the Guangdong skyscrapers and speculative bubble which allows China to sell us $162 billion more goods a year than we sell them. It is that China's government, by rejecting free-market fundamentalism, can easily conquer American markets, where protection is now deemed passé.

And that is why the yuan has kicked the dollar's butt.

America’s only response is to have Alan Greenspan push up real interest rates so we can buy back our own dollars the Chinese won in the export game. The domestic result: US wages drifting down to Mexican maquiladora levels.

Am I praising China? Forget about it. This is one evil dictatorship which jails union organizers and beats, shackles and tortures those who don't kowtow to the wishes of Chairman Rob--Wal-Mart chief Robson Walton. (Funny how Mr. Bush never mentions the D-word, Democracy, to our Chinese suppliers.)

Class dismissed.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cafta; capitalism; freetrade; ftaa; nafta; protectionism; yuan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: hedgetrimmer
"China won't join NAFTA or CAFTA or any of those free-trade clubs. In China, Chinese industry comes first. And it's still, Mssrs. Friedman, the Peoples’ republic. Those Wal-Mart fashion designs called, chillingly, "New Order," are made in factories owned by the PLA, the Chinese Peoples' Liberation Army. "

China has been a member of the World Trade Organization since late 2001. It tried to gain admission for neigh on 20 years prior to being admitted. As part of the WTAO requirements, China drastically lowered tariff and non-tariff barriers to trade. China's strongest growth has occurred since WTO membership.

The economic analysis in this article is less than juvenile -- but, to be fair, economic theory is open to debate. However, even the simplest facts are, well not facts.
41 posted on 07/22/2005 10:13:50 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Or Milton Friedman. Or Thomas Friedman.

From the sublime to the ridiculous.

42 posted on 07/22/2005 10:14:23 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

WTAO = WTO


43 posted on 07/22/2005 10:15:57 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Read up on the steel industry consolidation. Reads like they're pulling the plug on the rampant speculators, but swinging the pendulum way over to the command and control side of things.

http://today.reuters.com/investing/financeArticle.aspx?type=mergersNews&storyID=2005-07-20T051150Z_01_SHA268889_RTRIDST_0_MINERALS-CHINA-STEEL-FACTBOX.XML


45 posted on 07/22/2005 10:44:31 PM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

We're Doomed! Doomed, I tell you!


46 posted on 07/22/2005 10:48:21 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
Thought you were a troll until I checked your membership date.... I don't care, I still think you are a troll.

If you were being serious...You are a hopelessly brainwashed, overly sensitive, hysterical douche.

Oooh, Oooh!! I don't like what someone says about my Lord and Savior, Jesus W. Bush!!! I can't intelligently answer the article because I have no working mind of my own, so I'm going to look up this guy's information and see if he is a Democrat troll!!!

If you were being sarcastic, I apologize. But this kind of idiocy aggravates me to no end.

47 posted on 07/22/2005 10:51:06 PM PDT by Captainpaintball (America: Hey, we lasted 230-something years...Nothing lasts forever!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
Good point. I wasn't trying to say that China plays fairly -- just countering the lie that it never wanted to be part of any trade agreements. The WTO cuts "less developed" countries a lot of slack.

BTW, even in very open economies, there is considerable government regulation regarding standards, etc. Chinese steel has long been poor quality -- they've competed on cost alone. There are greater profits to be made from high-quality product.
48 posted on 07/22/2005 10:52:34 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Liberals Dream "America Fails"

or

China floats 5% of their Yuan and the Libs Rejoice!


49 posted on 07/22/2005 11:40:14 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

We should only have free trade with free and developed nations.


50 posted on 07/22/2005 11:41:57 PM PDT by ThermoNuclearWarrior (PRESSURE BUSH TO CLOSE THE BORDERS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThermoNuclearWarrior
We should only have free trade with free and developed nations.

Even some "free traders" admit that true "Free trade" can only happen when their is a community of similar economies participating.

However many are not able to give up the pretense that you can conduct "free trade" with communist governments.
51 posted on 07/22/2005 11:51:30 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

bttt


52 posted on 07/22/2005 11:57:57 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: graycamel
Thought you were a troll until I checked your membership date.... I don't care, I still think you are a troll.

Very uncool thing to say.

53 posted on 07/23/2005 12:05:39 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Hi. :-)

I keep bumping into you.

54 posted on 07/23/2005 12:08:59 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
Hi! :-)

Easy thing to do on FR. LOL

55 posted on 07/23/2005 12:11:05 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Yep.


56 posted on 07/23/2005 12:15:31 AM PDT by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
However many are not able to give up the pretense that you can conduct "free trade" with communist governments.

The only thing the free traders have demonstrated is their lack of moral fortitude and their willingness to sell out the country. If their values could be packaged and sold we would find them dumped in the discount bin at the local Walmart. They don't care if their kids have to grow up under the constant threat of China's guns so long as they can buy that discounted pair of tennis shoes today. If later in life, their kids choose to repay them in kind, it will be well deserved.
57 posted on 07/23/2005 12:18:35 AM PDT by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

>:-)


58 posted on 07/23/2005 12:19:14 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Just a note...Greenspan was asked about this issue and stated while there would be an impact it would be minor in nature and he supported China floating its currency. I am not an economics major, but I trust Greenspan's opinion before the author's.


59 posted on 07/23/2005 12:27:10 AM PDT by shakespeare_101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: shakespeare_101

I'd trust just ANYONE's opinion over the author of this wretchedly biased article. :-)


60 posted on 07/23/2005 12:35:01 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson