[dirtboy]

Click below for a more accurate and honest discussion of Roberts.

CB, you are in the business of promoting rational opinons. Coulter is in the opinon of promoting bombastic opinions, some of which are rational and some of which are not. Hence the divergence in your opinions of Roberts.

[Sam Hill]

Not to be argumentative, but what was bombastic about Coulter's column on Roberts?

She said he did have much of a track record to go on. She said that in the past, GOP picks have turned out different from their expectations.

Both of these things seem to be pretty undeniably true. Where's the bombast?

[Congressman Billybob]

Thank you very much. But I don't draw such a sharp distinction between writing like mine, and Ann Coulter's. She is a very smart lady. Usually, I can easily see and entirely agree with the logical point she is making in each column.

Sure, she punches up her language in her classic way. She gives the lib-Dems apoplectic fits. That's her way. That's not my way. Still, I usually agree with her underlying logic. And occasionally, I say day-um, I wish I could write lack that. LOL.

John / Billybob