Skip to comments.
Bill calls for sex offenders' castration - mandatory castration of violent sex offenders
Associated Press ^
| July 22, 2005
| BOB JOHNSON
Posted on 07/22/2005 4:56:57 AM PDT by Former Military Chick
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Former Military Chick
To answer your question, clearly, this punisnment would unfairly impact Hispanic and black offender worse than white. Hispanic families have more children than blacks or whites and black males father more children than whites. Therefore, the same punishment for the same crime would have a great punishment impact on a Hispanic or nlack perp than a white. There are lawyers already buying yachts on their potential winnings!
41
posted on
07/22/2005 5:28:39 AM PDT
by
Tacis
("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
To: Graybeard58
Can you cite an instance where a woman committed a violent sex crime against a child under age 12? What is a "violent sex crime"? Depending on the defination, a woman would be quite capable of committing such an offense.
42
posted on
07/22/2005 5:33:22 AM PDT
by
LWalk18
To: Brytani
" During my criminal justice studies, we were introduced to cases where a person has gone through surgical and chemical castration as a means to prevent them from offending again. Castration did little to stop those who were hell bent on repeating their crimes."
Agree with you. The deviant "mind" wants what it wants. Their perverse actions are initiated in their perverse brain.
43
posted on
07/22/2005 5:36:14 AM PDT
by
SunnySide
(Ephes2:8 ByGraceYou'veBeenSavedThruFaithAGiftOfGodSoNoOneCanBoast)
To: TBarnett34
I've 'heard' that it's NOT a guaranteed solution... the fu_kers still continue their behavior.
Put'm down like a rabid dog.
44
posted on
07/22/2005 5:44:07 AM PDT
by
johnny7
(“'I bet 'ya think I'm 'kickin you Bob...!” -Sheriff 'Little Bill' Dagget)
To: Former Military Chick
Whatever happened to Devil's Island? Give them their own beach. Patrolled by sharks.
To: stockpirate
I completely agree with you. Other body parts and other items can be used to molest/rape.
46
posted on
07/22/2005 5:52:36 AM PDT
by
proudofthesouth
(Boycotting movies since 1988)
To: TBarnett34
They should make it mechanical (rather than chemical), it should be public, and every one on the sex-offender registry should be required to attend.
To: Former Military Chick
Simpler just to execute them. As they've destroyed lives, their lives should be destroyed.
Regards, Ivan
48
posted on
07/22/2005 5:54:40 AM PDT
by
MadIvan
(You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
To: proudofthesouth
What all fail to understand is that the deed is NOT about sex. It is about alot of things but not sex, this is what the research shows.
49
posted on
07/22/2005 5:57:15 AM PDT
by
stockpirate
(We can fight the Muslim Army in Iraq! Or we can fight them outback! Check my homepage)
To: Former Military Chick
Electronic bracelets are only good for tracking people willing to wear them.
Eventually, however, in the name of "fairness," everyone will be required to wear a chip embedded in their big toe, and we'll all be tracked everywhere, and punished for being untrackable. Like driver licenses, they'll be needed to move about "freely."
This country is going soft, what with a century of suckling at the govt mammaries. We don't (in sufficient numbers) uphold our culture, our heritage, our liberties---or our moral code.
Only the culture, heritage, rights and moral code of the justly convicted, elicit the sympathy of the left and the squishy middle, and that's the majority.
To: SouthernFreebird
Yeah, the old fashioned way...with a dull knife.
a dull plastic knife. Or spork.
51
posted on
07/22/2005 6:09:12 AM PDT
by
Mcirrus
(Future Reference)
To: Graybeard58
everything that I have read says that women make up about 5-10% of all offenders...it is true that they are not usually as "violent" (using drugs/alcohol to entice rather than force, but to me hurting any kid in this manner IS violent) and it is true that many of those are facilitators or reluctant partners--meaning that they aid an adult male b/c of some kind of fear of battery or abandonment and usually it is the woman's own female child that is hurt
not as common as male scum, but it does happen
one case that comes to mind: Carla Harris..accused of hurting a 3 year old (for some reason her name sticks with me...there have been other cases but I can't remember names)
also with women..this society, for some reason, thinks it isn't as bad or feels some kind of compassion for the woman (she was abused or hurt herself--boo hoo)...or they make jokes (like with that young blond teacher and the pre/early-teen boys) so it is often overlooked or downplayed
To: Former Military Chick
I think they should be emasculated then placed in the general population of maximum security prisons.
53
posted on
07/22/2005 6:13:13 AM PDT
by
Paleo Conservative
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
To: stockpirate
True. That's the reason that I don't think castration will stop them from molesting/raping.
Back in the late '70's/early '80's in the city where I live there was a guy known as the "Southwest Molester". He used a hair brush to rape women.
54
posted on
07/22/2005 6:15:37 AM PDT
by
proudofthesouth
(Boycotting movies since 1988)
To: chgomac
Castration of sex offenders is not a solution, in my opinion.
We had our male dog 'fixed,' but he still can & will readily mount any female dog in heat, he just doesn't make puppies.
Anyone bent on doing evil will find a way. Isolate them or eliminate them.
Regards,
Tomato Lover
To: Former Military Chick
Supreme Court Justice Scalia gave a speech a few months ago in which he discussed what the term "cruel and unusual punishment" meant. His view is that it means what it meant when the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution, so if something was allowed then it should be allowed now. If we don't want to have a certain punishment now, that is fine, but it needs to be done legislatively rather than judicially. So based upon that, the question becomes, was castration considered a proper punishment in 1789? If it was, this would be Constitutional, otherwise it would probably be declared cruel and unusual punishment.
56
posted on
07/22/2005 6:51:21 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: stockpirate
What all fail to understand is that the deed is NOT about sex. It is about alot of things but not sex, this is what the research shows. I don't believe that. Never have. There's a sexual aspect to this, otherwise they'd choose some other way to express their, well, whatever it is they're trying to express. They're sick and twisted, and their sexual desires are likewise sick and twisted.
57
posted on
07/22/2005 6:56:38 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: TBarnett34
I think they should cut off their weenie, too.
58
posted on
07/22/2005 7:04:06 AM PDT
by
buffyt
(It is not a CHOICE ~ It is a CHILD!!!!!!)
To: Tomato lover
Well, my male cat does the same thing to my two female kitties and they've all been fixed. So there you go.
I vote for life in prison with out parole.
59
posted on
07/22/2005 7:13:10 AM PDT
by
chgomac
To: r9etb
Belief doesn't change reality
60
posted on
07/22/2005 7:15:56 AM PDT
by
stockpirate
(We can fight the Muslim Army in Iraq! Or we can fight them outback! Check my homepage)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson