Geeze.. What is it with these people? Can't come up with anything to complain about in someone's record, so you start attacking their CLOTHES?
Granted, it was the Style section, but still...
1 posted on
07/21/2005 11:14:09 PM PDT by
kingu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: kingu
Which idiot at the Washington Post wrote that crap?! I noticed they didn't lend their name to it.
2 posted on
07/21/2005 11:17:10 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: kingu
They have got nothing, pathetic.
3 posted on
07/21/2005 11:17:12 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
("Rommel, you magnificent son of bitch.....I READ YOUR BOOK!! - Gen. Patton)
To: kingu
I thought they were a beautiful looking family. Most likely those were the kids Easter outfits.
4 posted on
07/21/2005 11:17:49 PM PDT by
pbear8
(Prime Choice is back!!!!!!!)
To: kingu
Admit it ... planting that lady out there, lifeless, with her two kids. That was just creepy.
To: kingu
They just can't stand it that someone is being presented to the nation who is just a smart, intelligent, decent person--they have to have overcome a drug habit or a "poor" upbringing (Clinton). The left is OBSESSED with judging people by socio-economic status and gender and race. If Roberts were a poor liberal black woman the Post would be publishing commemorative issues. But the very people who are always saying you shouldn't judge people by their race, gender or the amount of money in the bank account--or "judge" them for having a point of view that doesn't gibe with yours--can never, ever judge anyone by anything else.
6 posted on
07/21/2005 11:18:32 PM PDT by
Dr.Hilarious
("My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity."-Joe W)
To: kingu
7 posted on
07/21/2005 11:19:21 PM PDT by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: kingu
Funny how the Washington Post writer of this article bemoans the 50s nostalgia of Judge Robert's family. We all can surmise that the writer longs for the smelly 60s and the shaggy-haired Woodward/Bernstein 70s.
8 posted on
07/21/2005 11:20:08 PM PDT by
Vision Thing
(As Turner took in the breadth of Murdoch's domain, he wept, for it would never be his to conquer.)
To: kingu
This is the weirdest attack article on Roberts I've read yet.
To: kingu
This is all they got? Looks like the Roberts confirmation is a sure thing.
To: kingu
It sounded to me like whoever wrote that is jealous.
13 posted on
07/21/2005 11:27:02 PM PDT by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: kingu
They looked
wonderful.
So nice to see people dressed up for a change.
I suppose he'd rather see Mrs. Roberts in a black pants suit and pink blouse.
15 posted on
07/21/2005 11:29:37 PM PDT by
Texan
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
...There they were -- John, Jane, Josie and Jack -- standing with the president and before the entire country. The nominee was in a sober suit with the expected white shirt and red tie. His wife and children stood before the cameras, groomed and glossy in pastel hues -- like a trio of Easter eggs, a handful of Jelly Bellies, three little Necco wafers...Ugh... MEGA Barf Alert on this one. You have to read this drivel for yourself to believe it's for real...
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my miscellaneous ping list.
17 posted on
07/21/2005 11:34:25 PM PDT by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: kingu
The nominee was in a sober suit with the expected white shirt and red tie. His wife and children stood before the cameras, groomed and glossy in pastel hues -- like a trio of Easter eggs, a handful of Jelly Bellies, three little Necco wafers. You. Have. Got. To. Be. Kidding. Me.
I do not have an overly high opinion of junior college newspapers in this country but I would hesitate to accuse any one of them of publishing something this insipid. Condescension is generally a two-edged sword, but when employed in this plodding, ham-handed fashion it only cuts the wielder.
To: kingu
The fact that the "style" page can do nothing but attack people who attempt to dress properly for one of the more important events that can occur in one's life--meeting the President of the United States who is nominating you for the Supreme Court--shows how messed up the liberal elite in this country are.
To: doug from upland; NautiNurse; Howlin; Mia T
20 posted on
07/21/2005 11:35:11 PM PDT by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: kingu
Yikes, that pic is a little creepy. Why'd they do that to their children?
25 posted on
07/21/2005 11:39:11 PM PDT by
k2blader
(Was it wrong to kill Terri Shiavo? YES - 83.8%. FR Opinion Poll.)
To: kingu
Since nobody has the guts to ask, then I'll ask the apparently forbidden question: what the hell is a "taupe pump?"
27 posted on
07/21/2005 11:41:30 PM PDT by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
To: kingu
But these same kinds drooled over Jacqui and "Camelot". Hypocrites.
29 posted on
07/21/2005 11:43:27 PM PDT by
mrsmel
To: kingu
I'm getting damn tired of the anti-white remarks by this newspaper and Letterman, among others.
It's getting old and offensive. The self-hating guilty, white libs should go live in France.
30 posted on
07/21/2005 11:44:22 PM PDT by
Finalapproach29er
(America is gradually becoming the Godless,out-of-control golden-calf scene,in "The Ten Commandments")
To: kingu
This was one pathetic article.
It's nice to see that some people still do dress with class and modesty.
31 posted on
07/21/2005 11:44:45 PM PDT by
jan in Colorado
("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge." Hosea 4:6)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson