To: SierraWasp; .38sw; 1 FELLOW FREEPER; 101viking; 1lawlady; 2Fro; 2rightsleftcoast; 357 SIG; ...
I find this really ironic that a judge removed a ballot measure that was going to give judges too much power.
If there's a lesson to be learned, it's that You cant trust judges
16 posted on
07/21/2005 6:56:35 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: editor-surveyor
the democrats would rather destroy arnold than make the state work out for the people.
the "party of the people" is the problema.
18 posted on
07/21/2005 7:02:49 PM PDT by
ken21
(it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
To: editor-surveyor
The people who supposedly represent my family's interests in Congress is the stuff of nightmares: Woolsey, Boxer and Feinstein . No wonder a "mistake" was found in the so-called process.
The CA women who supposedly represent women - Woolsey, Pelosi and Boxer are hysterical, bombastic, over emotional and every negative stereotype of women.
Removing the redistricting initiative means we in northern CA remain in the quagmire of hysterical female representation!
GGGGRRRR!
To: editor-surveyor
If you prefer the current approach, whereby legislators draw their own districts, you're nuts. Crying "you can't trust dem judges!" is not an argument.
78 posted on
07/22/2005 10:14:11 AM PDT by
pogo101
To: editor-surveyor
Thanks for the ping. We CA republicans saw this as a glimmer of hope that the state might take a slight right turn, but it looks like right turns are slowly being declared illegal or unjustifiable. I'd move in a minute if I could find a job that paid as well as I have here and believe me I've tried.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson