Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator
Here we have, in a single sentence by this educated moron E.J. Dionne, the definition of why the left is stupid, wrong, and headed for additional, well-deserved defeats. Here is that magic sentence:

"But outside the ranks of the right wing, few Americans want their country defined consistently by Scalia's choices."

As anyone who's read any of his opinions on the Court knows, Justice Scalia has only one choice: obey the Constitution wherever it leads. Dionne, and his newspaper, and his dinner party set, and his brain dead political party, do not want "their country" defined by the Constitution.

When you think about the house-taking case from Connecticut, average Americans realizes that we DO want the country governed by the Constitution. And that is EXACTLY why Dionne's "they" are now in the minority, and why we must continue to beat them like a rented mule, until they wise up, or die of old age, whichever comes first.

Did I miss anything?

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Re: John Roberts, Supreme Court Nominee"

8 posted on 07/21/2005 10:27:09 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush's SECOND appointment obey the Constitution? I give 95-5 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob

Excellent post, sir!

Average people are able to understand the implications of the Kelo case, and more and more of them are scoffing at the nonsense these liberal clowns spew.


9 posted on 07/21/2005 10:39:22 AM PDT by Grandma Pam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
As anyone who's read any of his opinions on the Court knows, Justice Scalia has only one choice: obey the Constitution wherever it leads. Dionne, and his newspaper, and his dinner party set, and his brain dead political party, do not want "their country" defined by the Constitution.

I wonder how many people in this country have considered or thought about what this country would be like had the Supreme Court -- throughout its entire history -- hewn to strict interpretation of the Constitution. It'd sure be different than what we see now, I'm sure.

It'd be an interesting exercise in alternate history to identify 10 or 20 salient 5-4 decisions, "reverse" them, and then extrapolate the changes in history that would follow. Not something I could do, but a political scientist/historian??

11 posted on 07/21/2005 10:49:41 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
If Americans were truly concerned and upset with their country being "defined consistently by Scalia's choices", they would have voted for John Kerry and a Democratic Senate in 2004.
14 posted on 07/21/2005 11:02:33 AM PDT by soxfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob; SierraWasp

Sounds good, prpoperty rights are so important!


17 posted on 07/21/2005 11:15:30 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

Not a one. :-)


36 posted on 07/21/2005 6:05:34 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson