Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-intel officers speak on Plame's behalf
Ledger-Enquirer.com ^ | July 120 2005 | AP

Posted on 07/20/2005 5:27:49 PM PDT by blogblogginaway

WASHINGTON - Eleven former intelligence officers are speaking up on behalf of CIA officer Valerie Plame, saying leaking her identity may have damaged national security and threatens the ability of U.S. intelligence gathering.

In a statement to congressional leaders, the former officers said the Republican National Committee has circulated talking points focusing on the idea that Plame was not working undercover and deserved no protection.

There are thousands of U.S. intelligence officers who work at a desk in the Washington, D.C., area every day who are undercover as Plame was when her identity was leaked, the 11 former officers said in a three-page statement.

The former officers' statement comes amid revelations that top presidential aide Karl Rove was involved in leaking Plame's identity to columnist Robert Novak and Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper, and that Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, Lewis Libby, also was a source for Cooper on the Plame story.

The leaking of Plame's identity followed public criticism leveled against the Bush White House by Plame's husband, former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson. He suggested the administration had manipulated intelligence to justify going to war in Iraq. A criminal investigation into the leaks is ongoing.

"Intelligence officers should not be used as political footballs," the 11 said. "In the case of Valerie Plame, she still works for the CIA and is not in a position to publicly defend her reputation and honor."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cialead; lyingliars; plamerove; rats; redspooks; sorelosers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
"she still works for the CIA and is not in a position to publicly defend her reputation and honor."

I thought I just read she was on a leave of absence?

1 posted on 07/20/2005 5:27:50 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Here we go. Anti-Bush moles in the agency want to try to do some damage to him. When does Porter Goss finally clean house?


2 posted on 07/20/2005 5:29:32 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Who made whom a political football?


3 posted on 07/20/2005 5:29:52 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
"she still works for the CIA and is not in a position to publicly defend her reputation and honor."

She just returned from a leave of absence, but I guess she doesn't have the right to free speech? Just the right to pose for photos for Vanity Fair?

4 posted on 07/20/2005 5:31:17 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Dean won't call Osama guilty without a trial, but DeLay and Rove should be in jail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

11 out of thousands.
Make that 11 anonymous EX-intel officers. Okay, I'm convinced....NOT! It's a shame they could not put their names out there. Afraid of scrutiny?


5 posted on 07/20/2005 5:31:57 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Here we go. Anti-Bush moles in the agency want to try to do some damage to him. When does Porter Goss finally clean house?

These are all former CIA folks. Not much Goss can do about them. Of course, we're left to assume that they have no political motivations in ossuing their statement.

6 posted on 07/20/2005 5:32:56 PM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
In the case of Valerie Plame, she still works for the CIA and is not in a position to publicly defend her reputation and honor."

She can only appear on the cover of "Vanity Fair" with her blowhard narcissistic husband who has shredded her reputation and her honor by boasting about how Valerie "outed" her Agency affiliation to him during a "heavy makeout session" on their third date....when he was still married to another woman, btw.
7 posted on 07/20/2005 5:33:49 PM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Why did she draw attention to herself by doing a (glib) photo shoot for Vanity Fair?


8 posted on 07/20/2005 5:34:51 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (America is gradually becoming the Godless,out-of-control golden-calf scene,in "The Ten Commandments")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob

You, of course, are correct. I read it and then forget it in my response. Doh.


9 posted on 07/20/2005 5:35:49 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Yes, the word FORMER also struck me right away that this report stinks (as if I didn't expent it to...).


10 posted on 07/20/2005 5:40:22 PM PDT by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bob

I'll bet they're all Democrats...

If they are real. The leftist MSM has been known to make stuff up.


11 posted on 07/20/2005 5:40:32 PM PDT by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Mommygate:
Joe Wilson said it's illogical to think Valerie would have pushed to have him sent overseas, since she needed him at home to help with the twins.
12 posted on 07/20/2005 5:44:53 PM PDT by syriacus (To WHICH entity does LIBELLER JOE WILSON pledge is allegiance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demnomo

They are worse than democrats, they are subversives who had their noses so far up Clintons ass they were breathing methane.


13 posted on 07/20/2005 5:44:55 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Eleven former intelligence officers

Why didn't the AP name them?!

If the CIA wants respect they need to earn it. Maybe they should spend more time worrying about TERRORISTS than sending a political hack to Niger to try to take down a sitting president.

I still want the name of THE PERSON who signed off on sending the LIAR to Niger.

14 posted on 07/20/2005 5:44:56 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Finalapproach29er


"The Spy Who Shagged Me" - By J. Wilson

15 posted on 07/20/2005 5:45:05 PM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

This is total BS; she hasn't been covert in something like 9 years. There was no provision of the law broken whatsoever.

DemocRats are trolls.


16 posted on 07/20/2005 5:48:43 PM PDT by Marauder (Those who target innocent civilians are evil incarnate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
Isn't reassuring to know that even if the CIA can't infiltrate covert agents into the ranks of those trying to destroy the U.S., the DNC has no trouble infiltrating covert party partisans into the ranks of the CIA? Real reassuring!
17 posted on 07/20/2005 5:50:48 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
This probably explains why they are former intelligence officers.
18 posted on 07/20/2005 5:51:38 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (We did not lose in Vietnam. We left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drpix
CORRECTION: Isn't it reassuring..."
19 posted on 07/20/2005 5:52:02 PM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1446721/posts <- Xref
20 posted on 07/20/2005 5:53:45 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson