A tough year for the AFL-CIO

The AFL-CIO is celebrating its 50th anniversary this year, but don't expect any champagne to be flowing at the organization's annual convention next week. It's been a lousy year -- indeed a miserable several decades -- for Big Labor. With union membership falling to historic lows and the unions' political clout on the wane, even while unions pour, literally, hundreds of millions of dollars into politics, the coup de grace for the AFL-CIO may come at the convention itself. Five unions, including the federation's biggest, have announced they will pull out of the group unless the AFL-CIO changes its focus to organizing new members. But even these dissident unions seem clueless when it comes to what really ails the shrinking labor movement.

Less than 8 percent of private sector workers belonged to a union in 2004, and, overall, only 12.5 percent of American workers carry a union card -- down from about one-third of workers in labor's heydays in the 1950s. If it weren't for compulsory union membership laws in 27 states, the number would no doubt be even lower.

The unions claim the deck is stacked against them when it comes to labor laws, but the truth is many private and public sector workers are forced to pay union dues as a condition of their employment, yet they have little say in how the unions spend their money. Despite court rulings that grant union members the right to withhold that portion of their dues that goes beyond negotiating and administering the union contract, most union members -- 78 percent according to one poll -- are in the dark about their rights, and the unions themselves want to keep it that way. Nor has the National Labor Relations Board, the federal government's chief enforcement agency, done much to force unions to inform their workers of their rights.

So how did unions spend their members' money last year? The 1.8 million-member Service Employees International Union (SEIU), the largest union in the AFL-CIO and the one spearheading the threats to pull out of the federation next week, spent $65 million not organizing new members but trying to defeat President Bush and Republicans in Congress. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees spent $48 million in the same, failing effort. The AFL-CIO spent $44 million trying to defeat Bush, and the Laborers' International Union of North America (LIUNA) spent another $8 million in the same quest.

But this is only the tip of the iceberg. These unions also gave millions to so-called 527 organizations, which can collect and spend unlimited amounts trying to elect or defeat candidates. According to its own press releases, the SEIU alone gave $26 million to America Coming Together, an anti-Bush 527, while the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) gave $1 million to the Media Fund to run ads against the president and Republicans. All of this money came from union dues, not from the voluntary contributions unions collect through their Political Action Committees, which spent an additional $52 million in the 2004 election cycle, 86 percent of it going to Democrats.

Some 43 percent of voters in union households voted for President Bush in 2004, according to exit poll data. But these union members have virtually no say in how their unions spend their hard-earned money. Next week's vote among AFL-CIO union leaders won't change that one whit. The president of the SEIU, Andy Stern, claims he wants the AFL-CIO to spend more on organizing new members and brags that his own union spends half its budget on signing up new members, a boast that is impossible to verify given the arcane methods unions use to hide their finances. But the AFL-CIO dissidents are among the worst offenders when it comes to wasting their members' dues on politics. Enforcing union members' right to withhold that portion of their dues that goes to politics would do more to reform the labor movement than any phony bolt from the AFL-CIO.

'Some 43 percent of voters in union households voted for President Bush in 2004, according to exit poll data. But these union members have virtually no say in how their unions spend their hard-earned money.'

'Unions should exist for two reasons.
1. Collective bargaining.
2. Employee advocacy. '

Members should be shouting, "Shut Up and take care of your members".

Imagine the anguish of watching these hacks waste your money year after year and often having little say in donating your dues to begin with?

I was mainly referring to the unions in which most members are left wingers like the NEA and the AFT and the UAW and a few others like AFCSME.

I realize that many union members are conservative (I know a few) but it is up to them to stand up and force the issue of union corruption (they are cowards). Dues must not be used for political exploitation. They are now and 99% of them go to the Dems and worse. The members must work for reform or abolition of unionism.

You are confusing unions with union members. No one is saying all union memebers are bad, just that all unions are bad. Many people are forced to belong to unions - that does not make those people bad.

Which Unions (not individual members, union leadership) back the 2nd ammendment? I mean really back it by opposing people like Kerry, Clinton, etc.? I only remember unions trying to convince their members that Kerry was pro-gun.

Members should be shouting, "Shut Up and take care of your members".

Heh, my husband did just that last week. He got in his union boss's face and asked how she earned her mercedes when all she did was sit on her butt and sign onto contracts that have gotten progressivesly worse each year. And when he asked why his dues were going to support political candidates he didn't agree with she brushed him aside and suggested he didn't know what he was talking about. That broke the camels back and he told her to start the paperwork so he could quit the union. He said there were about a dozen more union members waiting in line with him.

Here in Maryland we are a "right to work state" which means you must join the union to work a union job. HOWEVER you can become what they call a CORE MEMBER. (which I am forced to be because of my loathing of demoncraps!) which allows you to work & the money that goes to political contributions/lobbying is NOT paid to the union. That puts you in a position where you can't run for shop steward or ANY elected position.(big deal!) What really sucks is that you can't vote on ANY of the contracts which you will be working under. You pay the lowest possible dues & have no say in your job or working conditions. EVERY November you have to re-apply for this status or lose it until the following November. This August will be my 19th year at this job,(started WITHOUT a union) to late to quit now!! It's been my experience unions SUCK & so do the folks they donate to!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.