Skip to comments.
World reacts angrily
Denver Rocky Mountain News
| July 20, 2005
| M.E. Sprengelmeyer
Posted on 07/20/2005 11:43:32 AM PDT by Graybeard58
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-313 next last
To: Graybeard58
The left would let the US get nuked by terrorists and do nothing in return? Taking out Mecca should only be the start.
2
posted on
07/20/2005 11:44:37 AM PDT
by
Jibaholic
(The facts of life are conservative - Margaret Thatcher)
To: Graybeard58
The smear tactics don't seem to be working.
3
posted on
07/20/2005 11:45:06 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: Jibaholic
Apparently there's a new party of appeasement in town.
4
posted on
07/20/2005 11:45:53 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
To: Jibaholic
5
posted on
07/20/2005 11:46:43 AM PDT
by
hershey
To: Graybeard58
Sometime you can know someone by the enemies he has. Jihadists? FM!
6
posted on
07/20/2005 11:47:11 AM PDT
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: Graybeard58
Bulletin: The U.S. reacted angrily to the savage, unprovoked 9/11 attacks.
7
posted on
07/20/2005 11:47:14 AM PDT
by
Buck W.
(Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
To: Graybeard58
There is a Constitutional question here. The FedGov shall not regulate free practice of religion. While Mecca is not inside the physical boundary of the United States, any action to interfere with that idol would be an interference with the practice of a religion.
8
posted on
07/20/2005 11:47:30 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Substance is essentially the relationship of accidents to itself)
To: Graybeard58
And where were all these pious voices when a Moslem terrorist cell got caught plotting to blow up Notre Dame Cathedral?
9
posted on
07/20/2005 11:47:39 AM PDT
by
Flatus I. Maximus
(I did not claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat tofu!)
To: Graybeard58
The world reacted angrily when Reagan called the Soviet Union an evil empire.
10
posted on
07/20/2005 11:48:17 AM PDT
by
eyespysomething
("Old Hippies" re-living their activist youth - the first time nostalgia had a body count attached.)
To: Graybeard58
Islamakazis always squeal loudest when they are hurt. If we had a formalized MAD policy that any terrorist nuke in any American city would result in an immediate nuking of Mecca and Medina, the vast majority of Muslims would turn on their Islamakazi brethren.
11
posted on
07/20/2005 11:48:28 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: Graybeard58
12
posted on
07/20/2005 11:48:30 AM PDT
by
Textide
To: Graybeard58
cheers for Tancredo. Good job ! Enough of the Politically Correct BS. Until Islam reformes itself, it should be viewed not as a religion but a totalitarian agressive ideology and treated accordingly.
P.S. If Tancredo runs for president in 2008, I'd be glad to vote for him.
13
posted on
07/20/2005 11:48:38 AM PDT
by
sergey1973
(Russian American Political Blogger, Arm Chair Strategist)
To: Graybeard58
A whole lot of Freepers agree with the scum of the world's governments.
Not me, I think Tancredo's on to a solid idea.
14
posted on
07/20/2005 11:48:56 AM PDT
by
Eagle Eye
(Those who do are more likely to do so than those that don't.)
To: Graybeard58
There's nothing like the truth to stir up liars.
Furthermore, the 'hearts and minds' of the muslims can never be won. They are set on seeing that islam is dominant, even if it means that their nice, soft lives in the West are forever changed.
It was god's will---sarcasm.
15
posted on
07/20/2005 11:48:56 AM PDT
by
Parmy
To: Graybeard58
Step 1...Get their attention.
Seems to have made some impact.
To: Graybeard58
TANCREDO FOR PRESIDENT 2008 !!!!!!
If we don't make it more painful for them to continue than it is for them to stop, what does everybody think we will continue to get? I agree with Tancredo - make it painful if they continue. We've got to stop appeasing the terrorists and the left if we're to survive.
17
posted on
07/20/2005 11:49:10 AM PDT
by
texgal
(end no-fault divorce laws return DUE PROCESS & EQUAL PROTECTION to ALL citizens))
To: RightWhale
The constitution says "congress shall make no law....". This wouldn't be a law - don't see an issue there.
18
posted on
07/20/2005 11:49:34 AM PDT
by
2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
(Is your problem ignorance or apathy? I don't know and I don't care.)
To: Graybeard58
"This was nothing but a fanatic speaking completely personally, irresponsibly and without thought of how far his statements would reach or what kind of problems they would create," Gul said,Gul, son, if your scared, just say you're scared lol.
Jeff
To: Graybeard58
20
posted on
07/20/2005 11:49:58 AM PDT
by
WaveMan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 301-313 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson