Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Merger with Mexico
World Net Daily ^ | July 20, 2005 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 07/20/2005 9:07:28 AM PDT by wesley_windam-price

One of the most frequently asked questions I hear is this: Why does the federal government refuse to accept its responsibility to enforce immigration laws and border security?

Now the answer is becoming clear.

And it's not pretty.

The shadow government – the elitists – do indeed have a plan. And it is a plan that does not include any vestige of U.S. sovereignty or constitutional government. It is a plan for merger – a European Union-style government for North America and eventually the rest of the Americas and the world.

It's all spelled out in the latest reports by the Council on Foreign Relations. There's a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

Though there has been no national debate on merger with the corruption and socialism of our neighbors to the north and south, there is a roadmap. And unless the American people rise up in righteous indignation against this plan, the roadmap to merger will become the inevitable, guiding force in setting U.S. policy.

In many ways, it already has.

The goal of this merger couldn't be clearer – "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital and people flow freely."

The CFR's strategy calls specifically for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." It calls for laying "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." It calls for us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations." It calls for us to "harmonize entry screening."

More open? How could it be any more open? How could the flow of people be any freer? Criminals, terrorists, drug dealers and other undesirables cross into the U.S. on a daily basis – unchecked, unmolested, unscreened. How could we have any less enforcement?

Well, imagine Mexico as the 51st state. That's a picture of what the CFR has in mind with regard to the flow of human traffic back and forth between the two countries.

By the way, even though you didn't hear any national debate about this plan, your president has already committed you, your children and your grandchildren to this policy, according to the CFR.

In "Building a North American Community," the shadow government's 59-page manifesto for merger, we are informed President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal March 23 when they met in Texas.

You might remember that little get-together. It was there that Bush characterized the the Minuteman organization of heroic citizen border monitors as "vigilantes."

Last month, a follow-up meeting was held in Canada, suggesting this plan be put on the fast track. The U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, explained at that time that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders."

Silly me. I thought the objective of Homeland Security was to protect the American people from terrorist attacks! But the real goal is making it easier for Mexicans and Canadians and anyone else using those territories to enter our country undetected and unmolested.

The CFR plan also calls for massive redistribution of wealth – more of your hard-earned money flowing to Mexico and Canada to make this panacea possible. It also calls for the implementation of "the Social Security Totalization Agreement" so that illegal aliens will be certain to bankrupt the system Bush claims to be trying to save.

It is a stunning betrayal of the will of the American people, the Constitution of the United States, the Declaration of Independence and all of our notions of limited government, self-government, freedom, sovereignty, the rule of law and justice.

I don't know how else to say it: It is an open conspiracy to commit treason.

It's time to fight the War of Independence all over again.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; cfr; free; immigrantlist; immigration; mexico; nafta; new; northamericanunion; openborders; order; trade; world
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last
To: wesley_windam-price
It's time to fight the War of Independence all over again.

and with this plan of a north american nation, wouldn't the president then call for the armed forces of both canada and mexico to join with ours in repressing said revolution? wouldn't the drug cartels in mexico join with the military to preserve their chance at free trade?
*shrug* jist a few things to think about.

61 posted on 07/20/2005 10:09:46 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Is it treason to default on our contracted social obligations? That's why these folks were ostensibly taxed originally. this is just what is required to deliver what was promised...and probably undone by 40 million abortions-people who would have and could have supported the baby boom retirement obligations.


62 posted on 07/20/2005 10:10:30 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
We can't absorb Mexico and maintain our culture of liberty and freedom.

Sure we could. Annex Mexico, give land grants to Americans for Mexican Land and cataracts to build infrastructure. And allow greater immigration for Eastern Europeans to settle in Mexico. Overwhelm their culture.

This is what we did to the Indians.

63 posted on 07/20/2005 10:11:37 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

"We can't absorb Mexico and maintain our culture of liberty and freedom. We cannot absorb Mexico and maintain our Constitution."

- Why not? Is there anything written into the constitution that prohibits another territory from willfully joining the US?


64 posted on 07/20/2005 10:12:40 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: wesley_windam-price

I and many others figured all that out sometime ago. That is why I despise almost every single politician. If Jorge was the christian man he says he is he would climb up on the soapbox and warn America what his fatehr and others before him have decided is best for the elite but he wont because he is one.


65 posted on 07/20/2005 10:14:10 AM PDT by winodog (We need to pull the fedgov.con's feeding tube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

I understand that, but these people have increasingly become ostracized by the masses. Power is ordained through the masses. No matter how much money they can throw around collectively, they still would have to get people to work with them. Money can't buy loyalty.


66 posted on 07/20/2005 10:16:04 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig
"What I do doubt is that the CFR is some secret cabal bent on subjugating the US to some ridiculous supranational entity for nefarious purposes."

Based on this ingle observation, how else would you explain an unenforced Mexican border that for all intensive purposes serves as a free-invasion zone?

67 posted on 07/20/2005 10:16:12 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

"Based on this ingle observation, how else would you explain an unenforced Mexican border that for all intensive purposes serves as a free-invasion zone?"

- Actually we have an open border with Canada. I don't see hordes of Canadians flocking to the US.

The problem with mexico is that their per capita incomes are far lower than the US while Canandians are not. Get Mexicans income on par with the US and there is no border problem.


68 posted on 07/20/2005 10:19:42 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

"Given that this is from WorldNutDaily, I'll take it with the appropriately large grain of salt."

Are you saying that this is just a pack of lies? If so, don't waffle, just come out and say it. Then you can go to the CFR website and take a look around.


69 posted on 07/20/2005 10:20:18 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

I just spent half a day in Tijuana and mexicans hate us.Sure they smile and accept our dollars for trinkets but dont anyone kid themselves. They will be free to come here and do what they wish. We will be killed or worse for trying anything in Mexico.

When I waited in line to cross the border there was a long line and it was 95% mexicans speaking spanish with many different types of documents and IDs. The elite are selling out america and they know it.


70 posted on 07/20/2005 10:21:07 AM PDT by winodog (We need to pull the fedgov.con's feeding tube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter

I would put the open border down to a lack of conviction on the part of both democratic and republican legislators to do anything about it. The dems ignore the open border because they can generally count on extra votes at election time because of it, and the republicans like it because their business contributors count on the open border to supply cheaper labor. There's no need to drag conspiracies into the mix when plain stupidity is adequate to provide the explanation.


71 posted on 07/20/2005 10:21:25 AM PDT by Little Pig (Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Old Professer

"It would be better if we did annex Mexico as the 51st state; at least they would have to pay taxes."

How do you think that? We PAY money to poor working people now through the Earned Income Tax Credit. Of course we're all going to be poor if this comes to pass.


72 posted on 07/20/2005 10:21:50 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mo

Yes.


73 posted on 07/20/2005 10:22:19 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wesley_windam-price

I have assumed this all along. (if you cant beat 'em, join 'em)


74 posted on 07/20/2005 10:24:26 AM PDT by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic

You haven't looked.

Hardly any FReepers will open their eyes and look.

The sheeple sleep on.

The bastards know the time is right.


75 posted on 07/20/2005 10:25:03 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

"Not going to happen that way.
The goal is for the elites to rid themselves of the Constitution, not bring more under its protection."

I've been thinking about this. If this indeed comes to pass, we can just do what the Mexicans do, form our own gangs and shoot the hell out of anyone gets in the way, politicians and bureaucrats included.

Mexico is essentially lawless and that is the culture they are importing, not this mythical "family values" red herring.


76 posted on 07/20/2005 10:25:33 AM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: winodog

"mexicans hate us"

- Yeah, because they are jealous. We have everything and they have nothing. If mexico's government was worth a damned, the people of mexico would have progressed economically to the point where they wouldn't feel urged to come here for a better life. Our own success make us a target. It always has.


77 posted on 07/20/2005 10:26:24 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: winodog

I spent a couple hours in Providence Rhode Island and the Mexicans hate us for sure.

But they are happy to take the money and anything that catches their eye.


78 posted on 07/20/2005 10:27:11 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

...I would put the open border down to a lack of conviction on the part of both democratic and republican legislators to do anything about it...

And you'd be wrong.

You've been offered links to the evidence and to the membership and summaries of the documents.

GO LOOK AT IT!


79 posted on 07/20/2005 10:29:11 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic
Is there anything written into the constitution that prohibits another territory from willfully joining the US?

The people of the United States and the Congress have to decide, not the territory and not the presidents of the countries without public debate.

The territory has to agree to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, do you see Mexico doing that? The Mexican people that are here don't want to necessarily assimilate, we have bilingual education and translators in our courts and hospitals and they send all their money back to Mexico in remittances.

Mexico is a nation, not a territory. We are a nation, not a trading bloc. There is no way that what they are doing is constitutional or good for America.
80 posted on 07/20/2005 10:33:14 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson