Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Merger with Mexico
World Net Daily ^ | July 20, 2005 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 07/20/2005 9:07:28 AM PDT by wesley_windam-price

One of the most frequently asked questions I hear is this: Why does the federal government refuse to accept its responsibility to enforce immigration laws and border security?

Now the answer is becoming clear.

And it's not pretty.

The shadow government – the elitists – do indeed have a plan. And it is a plan that does not include any vestige of U.S. sovereignty or constitutional government. It is a plan for merger – a European Union-style government for North America and eventually the rest of the Americas and the world.

It's all spelled out in the latest reports by the Council on Foreign Relations. There's a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."

Though there has been no national debate on merger with the corruption and socialism of our neighbors to the north and south, there is a roadmap. And unless the American people rise up in righteous indignation against this plan, the roadmap to merger will become the inevitable, guiding force in setting U.S. policy.

In many ways, it already has.

The goal of this merger couldn't be clearer – "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital and people flow freely."

The CFR's strategy calls specifically for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." It calls for laying "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." It calls for us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations." It calls for us to "harmonize entry screening."

More open? How could it be any more open? How could the flow of people be any freer? Criminals, terrorists, drug dealers and other undesirables cross into the U.S. on a daily basis – unchecked, unmolested, unscreened. How could we have any less enforcement?

Well, imagine Mexico as the 51st state. That's a picture of what the CFR has in mind with regard to the flow of human traffic back and forth between the two countries.

By the way, even though you didn't hear any national debate about this plan, your president has already committed you, your children and your grandchildren to this policy, according to the CFR.

In "Building a North American Community," the shadow government's 59-page manifesto for merger, we are informed President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal March 23 when they met in Texas.

You might remember that little get-together. It was there that Bush characterized the the Minuteman organization of heroic citizen border monitors as "vigilantes."

Last month, a follow-up meeting was held in Canada, suggesting this plan be put on the fast track. The U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, explained at that time that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders."

Silly me. I thought the objective of Homeland Security was to protect the American people from terrorist attacks! But the real goal is making it easier for Mexicans and Canadians and anyone else using those territories to enter our country undetected and unmolested.

The CFR plan also calls for massive redistribution of wealth – more of your hard-earned money flowing to Mexico and Canada to make this panacea possible. It also calls for the implementation of "the Social Security Totalization Agreement" so that illegal aliens will be certain to bankrupt the system Bush claims to be trying to save.

It is a stunning betrayal of the will of the American people, the Constitution of the United States, the Declaration of Independence and all of our notions of limited government, self-government, freedom, sovereignty, the rule of law and justice.

I don't know how else to say it: It is an open conspiracy to commit treason.

It's time to fight the War of Independence all over again.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; cfr; free; immigrantlist; immigration; mexico; nafta; new; northamericanunion; openborders; order; trade; world
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
To: Mike Darancette

Mexico will do the gobbling.
We're the only ones with anything to eat.


21 posted on 07/20/2005 9:26:25 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic

...Personally, I don't see any problem with this as long as both Canada and Mexico are anexed into the Union....

Not going to happen that way.
The goal is for the elites to rid themselves of the Constitution, not bring more under its protection.


22 posted on 07/20/2005 9:27:48 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

"The goal is for the elites to rid themselves of the Constitution, not bring more under its protection."

- Yeah, well that will have to happen over my dead body.


23 posted on 07/20/2005 9:29:22 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Types_with_Fist

Thank you.

Here's an interesting paragraph from the report:

"As liberal democracies (I guess this has been decided for us!), the governments also share common principles: protecting individual rights (Really?), upholding the rule of law (With the exception of the borders.), and ensuring equality of opportunity for their (non-)citizens. North America, in short, is more than an expression of geography. It is a partnership of sovereign states with overlapping economic and security interests (No, they are not overlapping. Mexico could care less about our security.), where major developments in one country can and do have a powerful impact on the other two."

My comments in paranthesis.


24 posted on 07/20/2005 9:30:54 AM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

4

that's right.


wnd is not a credible news source.


25 posted on 07/20/2005 9:31:37 AM PDT by ken21 (it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Mexico will do the gobbling.

Mexico has land and minerals and we have the money to gobble it up.

We could absorb Mexico today and still be the per capita world leader in wealth and resources.

26 posted on 07/20/2005 9:31:45 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic

Careful.

Those bastards own everything and most everyone.

But I'm with you.


27 posted on 07/20/2005 9:32:16 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wesley_windam-price
Dean: Immigrants are GOP's 2006 foil

28 posted on 07/20/2005 9:34:08 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Go read the report or google search cfr north american community.

You will see that they plan to bankrupt the former American taxpayer to "equalize" the continent.

It's marxist to the core.


29 posted on 07/20/2005 9:35:37 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ken21; Little Pig

And Phyliss Schlafly is a commie pinko.

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2005/july05/05-07-13.html

The CFR document lays "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." The "common security perimeter" will require us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations" with Mexico and Canada, "harmonize entry screening," and "fully share data about the exit and entry of foreign nationals."

This CFR document, called "Building a North American Community ," asserts that George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas on March 23, 2005. The three adopted the "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" and assigned "working groups" to fill in the details.

It was at this same meeting, grandly called the North American summit, that President Bush pinned the epithet "vigilantes" on the volunteers guarding our border in Arizona.

A follow-up meeting was held in Ottawa on June 27, where the U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, told a news conference that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders." The White House issued a statement that the Ottawa report "represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the Security and Prosperity Partnership."

The CFR document calls for creating a "North American preference" so that employers can recruit low-paid workers from anywhere in North America. No longer will illegal aliens have to be smuggled across the border; employers can openly recruit foreigners willing to work for a fraction of U.S. wages.

Just to make sure that bringing cheap labor from Mexico is an essential part of the plan, the CFR document calls for "a seamless North American market" and for "the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico."

The document's frequent references to "security" are just a cover for the real objectives. The document's "security cooperation" includes the registration of ballistics and explosives, while Canada specifically refused to cooperate with our Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).

To no one's surprise, the CFR plan calls for massive U.S. foreign aid to the other countries. The burden on the U.S. taxpayers will include so-called "multilateral development" from the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, "long-term loans in pesos," and a North American Investment Fund to send U.S. private capital to Mexico.

The experience of the European Union and the World Trade Organization makes it clear that a common market requires a court system, so the CFR document calls for "a permanent tribunal for North American dispute resolution." Get ready for decisions from non-American judges who make up their rules ad hoc and probably hate the United States anyway.

The CFR document calls for allowing Mexican trucks "unlimited access" to the United States, including the hauling of local loads between U.S. cities. The CFR document calls for adopting a "tested once" principle for pharmaceuticals, by which a product tested in Mexico will automatically be considered to have met U.S. standards.

The CFR document demands that we implement "the Social Security Totalization Agreement negotiated between the United States and Mexico." That's code language for putting illegal aliens into the U.S. Social Security system, which is bound to bankrupt the system.

Here's another handout included in the plan. U.S. taxpayers are supposed to create a major fund to finance 60,000 Mexican students to study in U.S. colleges.

To ensure that the U.S. government carries out this plan so that it is "achievable" within five years, the CFR calls for supervision by a North American Advisory Council of "eminent persons from outside government . . . along the lines of the Bilderberg" conferences.

The best known Americans who participated in the CFR Task Force that wrote this document are former Massachusetts Governor William Weld and Bill Clinton's immigration chief Doris Meissner. Another participant, American University Professor Robert Pastor, presented the CFR plan at a friendly hearing of Senator Richard Lugar's Foreign Relations Committee on June 9.


30 posted on 07/20/2005 9:37:46 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wesley_windam-price

Bookmark


31 posted on 07/20/2005 9:38:56 AM PDT by Black Tooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

"You will see that they plan to bankrupt the former American taxpayer to "equalize" the continent."

- See, this makes no sense to me. The US and Cananada are pretty much on equal terms on per capita wages, only Mexico lags behind due to their corrupt government. Why would they need to bankrupt both the US and Cananda to absorb Mexico? Anex both and mexico comes under our rule of law and monetary system...eventually the state of Mexico will equal out all on its own. IMHO anyway.


32 posted on 07/20/2005 9:41:14 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic

What fun is that for a bunch of power hungry elitists?

This is George Soros's club we're talking about.

Face it, the only thing that stands between the world and a totalitarian socialist hell is the American middle class.

Destroy that and you rule the world.


33 posted on 07/20/2005 9:44:16 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wesley_windam-price

Oceania is at War With Eurasia. Oceania Has Always Has Been at War with Eurasia.


34 posted on 07/20/2005 9:44:35 AM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic

Are you out of your mind?

They won't pay for a damn thing. We will, as usual!


35 posted on 07/20/2005 9:44:58 AM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

Couldn't agree more. And it will have to be over my dead body.


36 posted on 07/20/2005 9:45:40 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Frenetic

I believe this has already happened.


37 posted on 07/20/2005 9:45:45 AM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

IMHO, this has been the Feds solution to the problem of baby boom retirement with its attendant Social Security and Medicare obligations.


38 posted on 07/20/2005 9:46:05 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mark3681

It's not Canada I'm worried about. Mexico is the biggest problem. Canada could become the 51st state tomorrow and it would be "business as usual" as far as the US is concerned. Mexico on the other hand would require a lot more intervention.

Personally, annexation is preferable to just open borders. At least we'd be in control.


39 posted on 07/20/2005 9:50:20 AM PDT by Frenetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mo

Great plan.

Open up the flodgates and let the U.S. be burned and pillaged.

Then there won't be any pesky old white people whining about their Social Security and medicare.

Here's what our La Raza friends have to say about it.

"We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population... I love it. They are sh!tting in their pants with fear. I love it.... We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him."
~ Jose Angel Gutierrez, professor, University of Texas.


40 posted on 07/20/2005 9:51:00 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search CFR North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson