To: Antoninus
So if you were asked if he had any blame, you would answer "yes", because you think he should have done more ahead of time which might have prevented the attack.
Or maybe you would have said he was blameless, taking this as more of a political poll than a question of your true feelings.
Because your post certainly suggested that Blair does have a "fault" in this case, which means you think there are actions he should have taken which might have prevented the bombings.
To: CharlesWayneCT
"there are actions he should have taken which might have prevented the bombings."
Would immigration control be considered actions he could have taken which might have prevented the bombings, in your mind?
20 posted on
07/20/2005 7:27:33 AM PDT by
B4Ranch
( Report every illegal alien that you meet. Call 866-347-2423, Employers use 888-464-4218)
To: CharlesWayneCT
So if you were asked if he had any blame, you would answer "yes", because you think he should have done more ahead of time which might have prevented the attack.
Exactly. That's why this poll is stupid. People who think the government should take a HARDER line are having their opinions spun to support the leftist/dhimmi position.
26 posted on
07/20/2005 8:33:18 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson