Nope, Bush fault!!!!
2/3rds of the three "randomly" picked samole group..... Yeah, right.
No, its simply a preview of things to come when we are hit here in the U.S. again. The MSM and dems will hop on the "its Bush's fault" wagon faster than the dead can be counted.
(If what I just wrote makes you sad or angry,
How in the Hell is this 2/3rds? At best it is around %50.
"Two-thirds of Britons believe Prime Minister Tony Blair bears a share of the responsibility for the suicide bombings in London"
- How about blaming the stupid mohammedans who actually did the bnombings? How about blaming the ideology of hate that bred their fanaticism? How about reading the koran & hadith and finding out where the ideology is spawned from? I guess Forest Gump is right. Stupid is as stupid does.
tv.
promotes this stupidity.
Hmmm...
In the Brave New World of these enlightened ones, you're to blame for murder if you are willing to stand and fight the murderers.
God forbid the West attempt to give Arabs a better life vis a vis democracy. This is a slam against 8 million brave Iraqi's who walked miles under the threat of death for the privilege of casting a vote. The Guardian and every Brit who thinks like this should be ashamed of themselves.
"31 percent thought he had a little responsibility, and 28 percent thought he was blameless."
Gee, a more honest way to look at this commie newspaper's biased push poll is that "Most(59%) Britons believe Blair deserves little or no blame for the bombings."
Isn't is reasonable to hold the leader of your country at least "partly" to blame if the country is attacked by terrorists?
To say the leader is completely blameless, is to say that there is absolutely nothing a country can do to protect itself from terrorist attacks. But we obviously believe there ARE things we can do, or else we wouldn't spend billions of dollars trying.
A large majority in the poll found Blair either blameless, or only marginally to blame. That looks like a reasonable and good thing.
I guess I'm taking a different definition of "blame".
BTW, I am close to being of the opinion that there ISN'T much the leadership can do to stop things like this, so I would have been part of the 1/3 who said he was blameless.
This is silly. The PM doesn't even use the Tube.
Do they blame Churchill for the Blitz as well?
Yes, Blair deserves blame for the bombings, but not for joining in the Iraqi invasion. Blair is to be blamed for not ending Muslim immigration and for not deporting those already in Britain when he took office.
I wonder if they put out a poll asking the public if the four bombers were responsible.
Only possible alternative: A preemptive veto for terrorists over British foreign policy. BTW, the terrorists reserve the right to cite the Crusades as justification for their attacks. Staying on their "good" side may be a bit tricky.