Posted on 07/20/2005 6:23:03 AM PDT by Perlstein
Boy howdy, these folks did a fine job warning us about 9-11.
What is this about? Weird?
Nothing to see here. Move along.
You have a link to this? What's the origin?
Maybe the CIA should have been a little more careful with their assignments. They hired Wilson at his wife's request who launched a PR campaign against Bush and joined the John Kerry election tour. They have some explaining to do.
Larry Johnson. He sounds familiar. Doesnt he do TV now for CNN?
So they're confident of the facts, eh? And the people who are defending Rove see it a different way. Who the hell are THEY to say what others can say?? Take whatever stand you want, you lamebrains, but don't tell other people they can't take a stand. Hell, the Washington Times ran a story last week saying that Plame/Wilson were OPEN about their connection to the CIA.
The First Amendment rules, baby.
I wonder who these folks voted for the past 20 years?
These comments are being made because the liberal MSM and liberal Democrats are attempting to show that an innocent man has "broken the law," and they are using this issue to try to get him fired and to attack the President. It is the Democrats and their lap dogs in the MSM who are keeping this issue alive. Republicans would be happy if the Democrats dropped the issue.
"We are not lawyers and are not qualified to determine whether the leakers technically violated the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act."
Fine. Then shut up. You're attacking the wrong party anyway - fools.
Maybe we could look for them on that site...
Cheers!
She wasn't covert at the time so there was no crime.
That being said, we shouldn't go around revealing every non-covert CIA agent to the world just because they aren't covert.
Unless, of course, there is a rationale to reveal that name. For example, if the fix was in from the beginning and the CIA agent got her husband an important job even though she knew he wasn't right for the job because of his partisian democratic nature.
Especially, if that non-covert agent cannot stop her husband from blabbing and lieing to the world about the covert job that the non-covert agent got him.
The only time Democrats have ever gone so far as to presume giving a damn about the CIA is when they have a chance to target an official in a Republican administration.
This is all quite pathetic.
Beats me. I couldn't get past this:
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
And this:
The Honorable Harry Reid
lol. So true.
This is a liberal attack on Republicans. It's that simple. The liberals have been pushing this issue and the Republicans have been defending themselves. Then, the liberals want the Republicans to shut up. This letter is full of crap.
That should have been disgruntled formers.
I have a friend who was in the CIA for 20 plus years and he thinks all this crap is a none issue stirred up by the Dems for political reasons. I agree with him...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.