To: bimboeruption
Your comments are, shall we charitably agree, rather foolish. The President hit a home run with this nomination and chose a solid conservative who I believe will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade as an SC judge. The beauty is the Dems can't prove it and he should just give them Bader Ginsburg's answer of not answering that question.
We need another gem like him for the next vacancy.
To: af_vet_1981
"The beauty is the Dems can't prove it and he should just give them Bader Ginsburg's answer of not answering that question."
This I beleive, is the key. It comes down to the fact that they hired a pro (of both acting and gov't) to coach this guy. That is the key.
51 posted on
07/19/2005 7:36:48 PM PDT by
strategofr
(What did happen to those 293 boxes of secret FBI files (esp on Senators) Hillary stole?)
To: af_vet_1981
Of course, the Court must be presented with a compelling appeal, and then the Court must decide to hear the appeal. And that, theoretically, may not happen in twenty years.
58 posted on
07/19/2005 7:39:46 PM PDT by
soupcon
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson