The brief not only argued that the regulations were constitutional, notwithstanding the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade, but it also made the broader argument that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided - an argument unnecessary to defend the regulation. The Supreme Court sided with the government on the narrower grounds that the regulation was constitutional.
The demon spawn aren't going to like this. Too bad. Let's roll!
1,693 posted on 07/19/2005 8:04:46 PM PDT by Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)