Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexKat
BUT!! There were A LOT of anchors and TH's that pointed fingers to the Lunsfords, LOOONNGG before Mark suspected them. INCLUDING many Freepers!

Give Mark a break already, b/c to so many, in the very initial stages, it did appear the Lunsfords were involved, but I wasn't one [of them] pointing fingers at them.

122 posted on 07/19/2005 12:48:07 PM PDT by the Deejay (THE LADY DEEJAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: the Deejay

the Deejay you are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine. We can agree to disagree about Mark Fuhrman. I simply do not have faith in Mark. I don't think that there is anything outstanding about him. The only thing that I see is he gets more tv exposure than any other PI.


125 posted on 07/19/2005 12:51:42 PM PDT by TexKat (Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

To: the Deejay

Lunsford

gramps did look a bit nervous at the beginning of the case.....for good reason, it turned out.....his attempted kidnap/rape cases from almost 50 years ago was going to be revealed, and he knew it.

Had Fuhrman known that information when he made his early remarks, he wouldn't have said what he did when he did.

Fuhrman's a good cop/detective.....he had OJ's azz in about 30 minutes.


136 posted on 07/19/2005 1:02:30 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson