[Zee2]

not "how did he rule on the brief?"
how did he rule on what ever matter was before his court, that motivated the brief.

and it was an actual question....whenever there is brief it is done in some kind of context...the context is very important..i was simply asking what was the context?

[SolidSupplySide]

The point is that the brief may have been irrelevant to the issue of Judith Miller going to jail. The judge did not have to pass judgement on the claims the MSM made in their brief. Are you actually arguing otherwise?

The interesting part of this matter is how the media makes legal assertions in court, and then proceeds to take editorial positions completely opposite of their legal position. The MSM doesn't even mention their legal position. The bias exhibited by the MSM in this matter is unmatched in recent history. This is worse than CBS and their fake memo.

[SolidSupplySide]

whenever there is brief it is done in some kind of context...the context is very important..i was simply asking what was the context?

We don't know how the brief fit into the context of the case. It is pointless to speculate.