Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack

So I guess there was a little bit of a 'bang' after all.

There was no compression wave to hold the critical mass together long enough for a bigger bang. This is totally consistent with what I have been saying. You just don't get it. There was a critical mass of U-235 (not plutonium in this case) that managed to release a lot of radiation and cause some damage to the lab equipment. A small 'bang'. It didn't hurt anyone because they were a quarter mile away. Where are the high explosives? Where is the 'exotic' polonium/beryllium trigger? They aren't there because they aren't needed (for a small 'bang').


142 posted on 08/14/2005 12:42:41 AM PDT by calenel (The Democratic Party is the Socialist Mafia. It is a Criminal Enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: calenel

That's a ridiculous argument...that just because a few laboratory metal supports were bent...that somehow atomic triggers and precise timing aren't required for a meaningful weapon.

You're grasping for straws in your ill-fated quest to somehow frighten all of the U.S. into sharing your old Y2K bunker with you.

Won't work.

143 posted on 08/14/2005 1:04:13 AM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson