[calenel]

"That rules out all stolen weapons from the past. What you are talking about is the brand new construction of an atomic weapon, and even there you are admitting that extensive maintenance (e.g. chemical separation of Polynium from Lead) in clean room labs (e.g. no air, no heat, no humidity) by highly skilled personnel is required."

You don't even know what you are talking about. You use the words but you don't know what they mean, and you apparently don't know the difference between polonium and plutonium. And I see that you are posting the same boilerplate b.s. on this other thread.

[little jeremiah]

Just fyi, your first link takes me to the beginning of this thread, and the second link takes me to "this document does not exist etc".

I am reading with interest this debate (and others like it) and since I am an unlettered ignoramous and know nothing about physics, chemistry, or nuclear bomb manufacture, I have no informed opinion about either side. I can only try to gauge attitudes or motives, guided by simple mother wit.

Could you explain in simple laymans' language, whether you think it impossible or not for AQ or some version of it to nuke us with some kind of nukes either in the CONUS or soon to be here? Since others on these threads say it is impossible for various reasons, I'd like to hear your opinion. If you don't mind.

[Southack]

"You don't even know what you are talking about." - calenel

I'm not the one who has to shuck and jive behind after-the-fact pleas of "sarcasm" after being caught in blatant falsehoods. See post #106, among others.