Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Left's list for high court seen as setup
The Washington Times ^ | 7-18-05 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 07/18/2005 11:47:23 AM PDT by JZelle

Democrats are floating candidates who they consider acceptable Supreme Court nominees primarily to ensure that they can complain later about not "really" being consulted by President Bush when none are selected, according to conservatives. They say the three Hispanic judges who Democratic leaders offered Mr. Bush in a private meeting earlier this week to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor are all non-starters. "It's a cynical tactic intended to set themselves up so that when the president nominates someone they haven't mentioned, they can jump up and down and scream about how they weren't really consulted," said Manuel Miranda, chairman of the Third Branch Conference, which is lobbying to put conservative nominees on the bench.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; conservative; judge; justice; scotus; shortlist; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
These people just never stop!!
1 posted on 07/18/2005 11:47:24 AM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle

I'm shaking in my boots.

And I'm not even wearing boots.


2 posted on 07/18/2005 11:49:37 AM PDT by VoiceOfBruck (He asked him knowingly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

How many Evangelicals or practicing Catholics are in Bush's final four?

That is the metric.


3 posted on 07/18/2005 11:53:37 AM PDT by ex-snook (Protectionism is Patriotism in both war and trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Let's get together and send our 'acceptable' names for the 2008 Democratic nomination for President.


4 posted on 07/18/2005 11:54:49 AM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Um, 'final 4' doesn't matter.

He nominates one.


5 posted on 07/18/2005 11:55:23 AM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Ward Churchill

Michael Moore

George Soros

Al Franken


A democrat acceptable short list direct off the democratic short bus.


6 posted on 07/18/2005 11:55:59 AM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

I still want to see the list of people that the Democrats consider "unacceptable."


7 posted on 07/18/2005 11:57:08 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Liberalism cannot survive in a free and open society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Pretty silly. They will push and bluff until they realize the consequences -- no more filibusters and Bush can get whomever he wants confirmed.

They don't want it to come to this. I suspect that they will pull back at some point.


8 posted on 07/18/2005 11:58:05 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Sorry not liberal enough.


9 posted on 07/18/2005 11:59:11 AM PDT by handy old one (It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

I have decided the Democratic Party needs to officially change its name to the Indignation Party. That is all they do, call the news cameras around and throw Indignation Parties.


10 posted on 07/18/2005 11:59:48 AM PDT by msnimje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

I have 'thought on it', and I simply can't think of an 'acceptable' name for the 2008 democRAT nomination for 'president'


11 posted on 07/18/2005 12:03:52 PM PDT by skyhawk9211 (skyhawk921 ( Semper FI - Marine Air))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: handy old one

I was picking "moderate" democrats.


12 posted on 07/18/2005 12:05:32 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
"Um, 'final 4' doesn't matter."

"He nominates one."

You're right. But if they are not well represented in the 'final four' their name won't even get in the hat!

13 posted on 07/18/2005 12:06:01 PM PDT by ex-snook (Protectionism is Patriotism in both war and trade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
My own prediction is that the Dem's have NO intention to vote on a SCOTUS nominee. They will continue to ask for more & more info until October comes and goes.

Once a nominee is selected... the DNC/MSM will begin the drumbeat. 24/7 propaganda that the guy/gal is toooo conservative... toooo much of an activist. If they can manipulate the polls to their favor... they might force an impasse.

14 posted on 07/18/2005 12:06:25 PM PDT by johnny7 (“'I bet 'ya think I'm 'kickin you Bob...!”” -Sheriff 'Little Bill' Dagget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Dems expect Republicans to act as though they've lost the election, which is expected.

Problem is, the GOP seems to agree with them.

Party discipline does not exist in the GOP, with idiots like Specter, McCain and Graham running around.


15 posted on 07/18/2005 12:08:06 PM PDT by Dolphan (God Bless our Military and their families)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Strangely enough, this reminds me of times when I was a kid. I'd do something wrong, get punished, and I'd cry. Then my mom or dad would say, "Shut up, or I'll really give you something to cry about."

Well, if the Dims push too hard, the pubbies will REALLY give them something to cry about - no more filibusters on judicial nominees. (I only wish it could be for all presidential nominees, but alas.)

16 posted on 07/18/2005 12:10:11 PM PDT by savedbygrace ("No Monday morning quarterback has ever led a team to victory" GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
I still want to see the list of people that the Democrats consider "unacceptable."

Anyone that George Bush or any conservative names, will name or even thinks about naming.

17 posted on 07/18/2005 12:11:46 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
"Let's get together and send our 'acceptable' names for the 2008 Democratic nomination for President."

They would need someone who would reflect the qualities of their party. Here are my top three candidates.

1. Pauly Shore
2. Michael Schiavo
3. Ward Churchill
18 posted on 07/18/2005 12:32:13 PM PDT by Mcirrus (Future Reference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mcirrus
They would need someone who would reflect the qualities of their party. Here are my top three candidates.

1. Pauly Shore
2. Michael Schiavo
3. Ward Churchill

You forgot:

4. GeorgeMichael
5. Paul Reubens
6. Rob Lowe
7. R. Kelley
8. Mike Tyson

19 posted on 07/18/2005 12:55:33 PM PDT by Minn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

When is somebody on the RIGHT going to have the GUTS to stand up and say = YOU LOST - YOU DON'T GET TO SELECT ..??


20 posted on 07/18/2005 12:57:40 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson