Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phoenix0468
Perhaps you have a point. However, California passed Proposition 227 in 1998 that mandated the end of bilingual education. The results are summarized:

Test Scores Soar After California Bans Bilingual Ed.

"In 1998, California voters passes a voter initiative, Proposition 227, that banned bilingual education. Two years later, the state issued its Stanford 9 Achievement Test reports."

"Among 2nd grade students with Limited English Proficiency (LEP), the portion of students testing above the median increased nearly 50% in the three subjects tested: Reading, Math, and Language. Opponents of English immersion have long argued that it was necessary for children to spend a few years in bilingual education to prepare themselves for English-language instruction. However, youngest students showed the greatest increases in test scores."

"These test scores measure only those students who remain in special classes for LEP. Another important measure of the effectiveness of LEP programs is how many of the students in the programs are able to be sent into mainstream classes. Redesignation tends to moderate test score improvements, as it removes the top-performing students from the testing pool, lowering the test averages. However, despite this, redesignation rates increased 12%, accelerating their improvements."

"Proponents of bilingual education have offered alternative explanation for the improving test scores, including increasing familiarity with the test, smaller class sizes, and a return to "phonics-based" reading instruction. (Phonics is a method of learning to read by recognizing which sounds are produced by letters and letter combinations. Previously, the education establishment had also predicted that the introduction of phonics would be harmful.)"

"These factors may have played a role; test scores improved among English-language students. In any case, these factors would have made it difficult to prove that ending bilingual education was the factor responsible for the test score improvements. However, many school districts attempted to defy Proposition 227. By doing so, they helped prove the case against themselves. Those school districts which most resisted implementation of Proposition 227 showed the smaller improvements[this still goes on today]; whereas those that most aggressively implemented Proposition 227 showed the greatest improvements."

The upshot is that English Immersion is the best way to bring students into the mainstream educational system. Piddling along for years coddling those who do not have a strong English language capability (or those who don't wish to learn it) does no one a favor.

328 posted on 07/18/2005 4:16:36 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]


To: 45Auto
You apparent misunderstanding of my post is obvious. TESL or Teaching English as a Second Language is an approach to learning English in an immersive environment, not in a bilingual one. The teacher need not know any other language but English to teach using TESL methods, but must understand that the students who are learning are not standard English speakers.

TESL has been extremely effective in getting international students up to speed in their comprehension of the English language and their ability to understand their instructors when they are admitted to a university or college.

This method could be very effective in teaching children who are not taught standard English in the home. Not just inner city Ebonics speakers but those with other household issues, as my post indicated.
333 posted on 07/18/2005 4:31:16 PM PDT by phoenix0468 (http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson